How to Prove Flat Earthers are Idiots

Step 1 - provide evidence that proves curvature, that we live on a spinning ball. A simple experiment that anyone can do to demonstrate the curve of the earth.

Step 2 - provide evidence that the earth is traveling around the sun at 66,000 miles per hour, and moving on a curved trajectory through the universe at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour.

The claim is that we feel none of this movement because the speeds are constant, every constant speed plane I’ve ever flown in I felt the movement. And the earth is claimed to have no lid/dome, so we are flying in a convertible and feel none of it, and somehow all the water stays flat and stuck to the surface? Imagine a Zorb Ball Park claiming to spin at thousands of miles per hour and you feel none if it, and the door is open and there is no danger of you flying out:

I asked AI for a simple experiment that anyone can do that proves curvature and movement, the only answers were trust NASA, and the lights in the sky prove the shape of the earth (do the lights in your home ceiling tell you anything about the shape of the floor?)

There are 2 experiments that have been done that challenge curvature and the movement of the earth.

1 - A powerful zoom camera allows anyone to see to far. The official rebuttal to seeing around the curve is “refraction”, essentially claiming light bends perfectly to allow us to see the earth as flat, that’s strange.

2 - Airy’s Failure experiment. Sir George Airy put water in a telescope and saw no change or difference from an air filled telescope. The logic is that water is 800 times denser than air and therefore star light should travel slower through water, and if the earth is spinning at 1000 miles per hour there should be a detectable delay of the light traveling through the telescope as the earth spins. My understanding of this experiment is he proved the earth is stationary, and that the Heliocentric model is false.

Here is an animated explanation of Airy’s experiment:

Another way to prove flat earthers wrong would be for NASA to show us a high resolution unedited video from space of the earth spinning. Also zoomed in unedited video of the earth showing us detailed buildings and bridges, and then pan down to show us cities on the other side of the globe “upside down”.

Another way is for the authorities to answer all the questions, with factual logical answers. Like how the eff did they loose the moon landing technology? How did they film that video of Neil Armstrong and then the space craft leaving the moon, and the Nixon phone call to the moon like how was that even possible in 1969?

Explain the math of speed distance and G force of the Artemis II taking off and landing on the earth, and where is the 4k unedited video of this craft traveling at these ridiculous speeds and then being able to slow down without killing everyone on board?

Open up Antarctica, allow anyone to do an airship tour over Antarctica and beyond, proving it is what they say it is.

Spacebusters has some fantastic videos on Antarctica and asks some very interesting questions about time zones and canals and tunnels. Essentially the official time zones in Antarctica don’t make sense on a globe model but do make sense on Gleason’s flat earth map. Long canals and tunnels are built level and flat, as in they didn’t account for nor build curvature into it. What’s the globe explanation for this?

High altitude planes should be able to see mountains and buildings curving away from each other on a globe, where is the high resolution video evidence of this? If light bending refraction is the answer, then other high tech imaging equipment should be able to document this. Also the military has long range guns that shoot projectiles, basically a high tech canonball and they supposedly don’t account for curvature over long distances.

Whale song is said to travel long distances (6400km), on a sphere how does this work? Again the answer given is refraction, where is the testable repeatable experiment demonstrating refraction does this. Usually the answer is circular reasoning: sound can be heard over long distances and assuming the earth is a sphere the sound must refract, no proof needed. Even though the earth being flat would be the obvious logical reason why sound travels over long distances in the ocean. Sea level.

The same rational is used to explain line of sight communications on land, they say the waves bounce off of atmosphere and that’s why they are heard/received around the earth. If I remember correctly there are some frequencies that don’t “bounce” and instead penetrate and yet they are still received “around the globe”.

Darius J Wright is known for OBE or out of body experiences and teaching others how to do this. When out of his body he says he was shown what the earth is - a flat disk with a dome, a construct, a realm inside of other realms. Fascinating to watch, I have practiced his technique for months, no direct experience for me yet. I hope to have an OBE and get answers for myself.

Flat Earth Dave is fun to listen to and has some interesting distance observations, essentially saying the NASA claimed distances make no sense:

Mark Gober wrote the book An End to The Upside Down Cosmos, I like the way he explains things in a logical easy to understand way:

Dr. Robert Bennett discusses Airy’s Experiment along with the Michelsen experiments and the Sagnac effect. He has diagrams to help digest what he is explaining:

Eric Dubay has a YouTube channel, his 200 proofs video is interesting and food for thought. I would love to see intellectually honest scientists sit down and go through these proofs in earnest.

For me the shape of the earth and the cosmos are complex topics, the spinning ball model makes no sense, and as a surfer magic gravity water is ridiculous while a level sea seems logical and rational.

Learn to wing foil and surf foil. Learn to feel better, think clearly, and relate better.

Jump start a better life with my 7 day challenge.

My book is available now:

We know the authorities are lying about germs, why would we trust any of their other claims?