RSSAmplifier

Blog

Civil Litigation Brief <sup class="reg-symbol">®</sup>

Updates and Commentary on Civil Procedure, by Gordon Exall, Barrister, Kings Chambers

civillitigationbrief.comRSS feed ↗10 posts

Latest posts

GIVING AN UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES WHEN OBTAINING AN INJUNCTION: REMEMBER IT CAN COME BACK TO BITE (AND SOMETIMES BITE HARD&#8230;)

When a party obtains an injunction they, usually, have to give an undertaking as to damages. There are now a number of cases where litigants have been found liable to pay damages as a result of that undertaking. We have...

CAN DELAY IN APPLYING TO STRIKE OUT AN ACTION FOR ABUSE OF PROCESS BE AN ABUSE OF PROCESS IN ITSELF? THE DANGERS OF LETTING TIME GO BY

Here we have a case where it was argued that the defendant's delay in bringing an application to strike out for abuse of process was an abuse of process in itself. The case points to authorities that "acquiescing" in an...

THROWBACK FRIDAY: SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES: AN OVERVIEW AND THE RELEVANT GUIDANCE CONSIDERED (AUGUST 2020)

Man of the posts in August 2020 concerned the impact of Covid. This post is the exception. It arose out of a Court of Appeal decision that month that reviewed the principles relating to similar fact evidence in civil cases....

AN ORDER FOR WASTED COSTS NARROWLY AVERTED &#8211; BUT THERE WERE ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES: &#8220;NONE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN THIS CASE HAVE COVERED THEMSELVES WITH GLORY&#8221;

This is a case where the judge found the conduct of a firm of solicitors "utterly extraordinary". However there were, in fact, a number of errors by both sides. This may (and probably would) have led to a wasted costs...

ATTEMPTS TO &#8220;REVISIT&#8221; THE PRELIMINARY ISSUES REFUSED: ALSO THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO SEE WITNESS STATEMENTS NOT JUST DOCUMENTS&#8230;

This is another case where a party attempts to "revisit" preliminary issues/a statement of issues that have been agreed and approved by the court. That application did not get very far. Further the judge observed that, although the parties were...

ADVOCACY THE JUDGE&#8217;S VIEW A RECAP OF THE SERIES 3: &#8220;THERE IS A SPECIAL RING IN HELL FOR A CERTAIN TYPE OF ADVOCATE&#8221;: WHY ALL LITIGATORS SHOULD KNOW THESE THINGS&#8230;

Back in the dim and distant days of 2018 this site ran its third series on "Advocacy: the Judge's View". A new series will start shortly. However before that we are "recapping" on the guidance given in the four previous...

WITNESS EVIDENCE WEDNESDAY: THE PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE DEFENDANTS: AN APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY &#8220;BARE ASSERTION&#8221;

The need to provide evidence and not simply make bare assertions is as important in applications as at trial. Here we see a case where the claimant obtained summary judgment in the face of a "paucity of evidence" from the...

COST BITES 433: WHAT ARE &#8220;SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS&#8221; WHEN YOU WANT TO VARY A COSTS BUDGET? WHY THERE WERE NO SUCH DEVELOPMENTS HERE

We are continuing our consideration at the appeal case where the defendant's appeal against a decision to vary the claimant's budget. The first reason the appeal was successful was because the first instance judge found that there were no "significant...

COST BITES 432: THE COURT CANNOT ALTER THE COSTS BUDGET UNLESS THERE ARE &#8220;SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS&#8221; : HIGH COURT DECISION

This case reiterates the essential point that the court has no freestanding discretion to vary a costs budget. An essential prerequisite of variation is that there must be a "significant development" that warrants a variation. There was no such development...

COST BITES 431: A CASE WHERE BOTH SIDES NEEDED RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS SO THAT THEY COULD ARGUE ISSUES OF COSTS: THE PROBLEMS FLOCK TOGETHER&#8230;

Here we look at a case where both parties required an extension of time in order to raise very significant arguments in relation to costs. The claimant had been late in filing essential documents for his own costs protection, the...