Cui prodest?

So we have to lean back for a bit of perspective and ask that old legal test “Cui prodest?”, who exactly benefits from all this destruction. Sure share markets and capital is designed to profit from growth and destruction but can this be an overriding goal for people or family dynasties if the end result is going to be a nuclear/biological wasteland. No, the end goal is not total destruction as this would defeat any meaningful goal and we can be reasonably certain that there is a meaningful goal if there is a concerted effort. Our task is to attempt to determine, what the end goal is AND who the perp is and the only potential solutions are those where we have matched pairs of goals and perps. A globalist ruling elite does not seek a nuclear winter, it would eliminate any useful result. A capitalist engine does not seek destruction of commerce. A communist following gains no benefit from starvation. We need to keep looking at apparent goals, likely outcomes and try to ascertain who might benefit. One pervasive thread is clear, centralisation of control, this suggests that long term goals are in place that would require people and obedient people, this kind of control is not needed in a nuclear winter, or depopulation scenario, military might is the only concentration of power that would survive. A biological wasteland is also not a useful goal, it can too easily bite you in the rump and make humanity or even all mammals extinct, no value there. Even a modest plague may result in loss of skilled staff to shut down reactors and monitor nuclear fuel storage to prevent unstoppable continent wide radioactive contamination, so that cannot be a goal.

Side note: There are those who will say there is no goal, it is simply the result of an emergent system. Capitalism will strip mine all of nature and human resources until there is no longer a profit gradient left to mine. It is the ultimate predator of value and while it is obviously a driver of innovation, because this is what will secure the profit it demands, but if left unchecked and allowed to proceed at break neck speed it will break a lot of necks along the way. The necks in question are the pillars of society that keep us human, capitalism does not notice because it only measures a single number at the bottom of the balance sheet and so it does not care, it is not avoiding the cost of capitalism, it simply has no intention of even measuring the harms.

Still on the side note: A few years back Mattias Desmet was taken to task because he proposed a system of “Mass Formation” where a collective of individuals thought the same incorrect way about something and this resulted in their doing stupid stuff. There are those who were, strangely vehemently, opposed to the idea because they claimed it would give the evil perps a free pass for what harm they were causing. This was a deliberately simplistic critique to make the situation appear binary while there were MANY causes to the effect. Mattias also was clear that there was an antidote and this was persistent dissemination of the truth, humour might improve the delivery, to eventually help/allow people to break free of the formed mass. The point here is that certain conditions may result in action that looks impossibly insidious or even evil but is a side effect of economy or human nature. Obviously wise minds would educate people of these negatives instead of hiding or suppressing the knowledge of the harm they cause and this as other censorship is a sign of evil intent.

Back the the main theme, what are the long term goals and who is directing the action.

First, I want to make clear that I do not believe that Satan, the Devil or the Negative Power is personally involved in this, I accept that there are spiritual forces at play in this creation but I believe that if we ascribe omnipotence to the Creator and near omnipotence to the Negative Power and they wanted to get their hypothetical hands dirty in this fight then our actions are LITERALLY IRRELEVANT, yet if you believe they are actively meddling in our day to day affairs this then I do apologise that I have wasted your time and you can click away. If the Creator wanted evil to go away it would be gone, ergo, we a left to contend with evil, I accept it may be required to provide balance and a reference point against which to measure good.

Secondly, I do not believe what we see is a direct result of emergent systems along the lines of Mass Formation or Capitalism that could hypothetically be due to chance. I believe such systems cause large scale effects and they can be tuned and controlled by skilled manipulators, however I do not believe they seek any self made goals, they too are a result of human goals and circumstances. The destruction we see is not naked entropy, it is organised in some way.

So what are we left with in terms of perps? I listed a few above “rich powerful globalists, family dynasties, religious fundamentalists, Marxists, acolytes of dark arts, TLA deep state controlled, media moguls, industrial complexes, energy barons“ but I am still am not convinced that the level of social destruction in the West would really serve these entities if they were logical as total destruction hurts them as well in the long run.

Another side note: Marxism, Stalinism and communism are often grouped and said to share some similar goals. While not equivalent in the strict sense, the application of all three on Earth have usually followed similar means and ends. This because true communism cannot really be a top down system and when it is bottom up it does not need a political movement to force it on others. Basically any top down system called communism is not and will fail. Proven by history and known to those that attempt to spread the movement who want to be the ones on the top. China is not communist, it is the worlds largest vertically integrated business powered by indentured labour and ruthless business practices against every other global business where it eventually overpowers any but the most desperate nation state opposition in every market it enters. I expect that China (the leadership) knows that eliminating all competition by absorbing the rest of the world would achieve a stagnating end.

If we limit ourselves to considering who might gain from the destruction of the West we are left with very few credible contenders. The list is very short and only has China on it. China has a lot of global markets and owns and earns a lot of US$, if the West were to fall then the amount of pain that China will suffer is hard to comprehend but it might survive. If we extend our level of destruction and include all of the industrialised nations then that rules out China as the beneficiary and there is no logical benefit from the destruction that I can see. Simply thinking these thoughts makes my head hurt because the magnitude of suffering would cancel any future benefits in my mind, even if it was China. So I keep trying to find a combination of OUTCOME and PERP and I fail.

The “Destroy the West” or “Destroy Civilisation” project is too big and long to be driven by just one mind. The risks of global destruction are too real to ignore yet appear to be ignored. There is no logic to it.

Given that I can find no logical combination of goal and perpetrator I am forced to give up my demand for it to be LOGICAL and consider if what drives the narrative may be IDEOLOGICAL and does not need to be rational in the way we think goals are set. This opens up a new field of end goals and perpetrators that we would rather not have. Goals can include total destruction or vapour ware metaphysical goals and perpetrators can be working from any ideology, religious fundamentalism, cult tenets, political utopias, tribal purity, eugenics or even revenge. Some perps will still strive for survivable outcomes but others may be actively seeking Armageddon. In this situation there is almost nothing that can be used as a motivator to stop the attempt.

Perhaps we simply need to try and stop the burning of trash cans and park benches from igniting buildings and give up trying to guess what is attempting the destruction. It is almost certain that some or most emergent systems are co-opted or corrupted because that is a force multiplier and we should try to eliminate and neuter any destructive systems. If we could get rid of large scale systems that are used to cause destruction the controlling forces would eventually become visible.

The KGB had plans to destabilise the West, China resists certain Western degenerative influences on the mainland but is happy to see them cause havoc in the West. Religious fundamentalism is happy to overrun neighbourhoods. Industrial complexes actively usurp political power in all countries. Banking schemes benefit from war, destruction and rebuilding. Yet none of these players would benefit from a nuclear winter.

Also a final though, if 90% of the global population were to die, “people would notice” and hiding would no longer be difficult for the perps, it would literally be impossible.

So if anyone want’s to suggest what end goal and perpetrator combination would justify the “Destruction of the West” or the “Destruction of Civilisation” I would be interested in your view.