“An Imperfect Prime Minister”
Mark Carney promised, during his campaign, that he was the man built for the moment, the one who could stand across a table from Donald Trump and not flinch. Now that he has been in office for well over a year, how do we feel about that promise now that the daily grind of governing has set in?
Watching how people talk about Carney has taught me how we, as Canadians, process leadership when the alternative might have been far worse. This is my attempt to work through that.
How a Central Banker Ended Up Prime Minister
To understand, it helps to remember how his rise actually was. Mark Carney had never held elected office before becoming Prime Minister. He built his career as an economist and central banker, first running the Bank of Canada and then becoming the only non-British citizen ever to run the Bank of England.
That matters because it explains why Carney does not behave like a typical politician. He did not spend decades climbing a party ladder speaking in soundbites. Carney built a career solving major, long-term problems in institutions that outlast any single leader’s term. That instinct has followed him into the Prime Minister’s Office, for better or for worse.
Justin Trudeau resigned as Liberal leader in January 2025 after nearly a decade in power. At that point, Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives looked certain to win the next election by a wide margin. Then Donald Trump began threatening Canada with steep tariffs and the idea that Canada should become the fifty-first American state. That threat alarmed the entire country. Liberals chose Carney as their new leader in March 2025; he was sworn in and called a snap election. Canadians went to the polls in April, and the Liberals won a minority government.
Canada elects a Prime Minister through hundreds of separate local races for seats in the House of Commons. The leader of the party that commands the confidence of the House becomes Prime Minister. Voters in any single riding are choosing their local representative. That detail matters because it means support for a governing party is never absolute. It just means voters judged their local Liberal candidate and their party to be the better option.
Nonetheless, no Prime Minister, and no leader in any democracy, can satisfy every voter and every interest group on every issue. There are concerns that Canadians will hold Carney to an impossible standard. That said, a Conservative government under Poilievre might have aligned Canada closely with Trump. The NDP, on the other hand, lacks a clear, unified strategic direction, which limits its effectiveness as an alternative. Many Canadians are glad to have ended up with a leader they see as imperfect rather than one who is incompetent.
A Trade War Where No Deal Stays a Deal
Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian steel and other goods in the spring of 2025, tied to a dispute over the existing CUSMA trade agreement. Carney’s first meeting with Trump in May of 2025 was cordial but produced no real breakthrough. Trump kept the tariffs and argued they were good for American manufacturing.
The takeaway from that meeting was what it revealed regarding any agreement with Trump. If a friendly, respectful first meeting could not resolve tariffs, then the idea that a Canadian leader could charm Trump into fairness is naive. It does not matter much who is Prime Minister if the other side treats every signed agreement as an inconvenience rather than a binding commitment. What people want instead is a leader willing to build alliances with other countries and reduce Canada’s exposure to a single country, and Carney is doing that work.
Still, politicians facing reelection every four years have a strong incentive to favour policies that produce visible, popular results before the next vote. A new manufacturing plant, a pipeline agreement, or a diversified export market takes years to materialize.
Many of the deals and investment commitments Carney has pursued fall firmly into that category. They will not show results before the next federal election in 2029. It becomes easy for Poilievre to say that none of it amounted to anything, even if they are still working their way through construction, negotiation, and implementation. This is an unfair standard, one that treats a first-term Prime Minister as though he were required to fulfill every campaign promise within his first year in office, a feat no leader in Canadian history has ever achieved.
This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Tearing Down Barriers Between Provinces
One of the less glamorous accomplishments is Carney’s push to reduce domestic trade barriers between provinces and territories. This is a problem most Canadians know surprisingly little about. For decades, differing provincial regulations on everything from alcohol to professional certifications have made it harder to move goods, services, and workers across provincial lines than it is to trade internationally. Economists have estimated that eliminating these barriers could add at least one hundred billion dollars to the Canadian economy.
Carney’s government introduced the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act, which received royal assent in June 2025 and came into force in 2026. The law requires the federal government to recognize goods and services that already meet a province or territory’s own standards, removing a layer of bureaucracy. Provinces have been negotiating alongside Ottawa through the Committee on Internal Trade, working toward mutual recognition of professional credentials and consumer goods standards across the country. This is genuinely significant because it required federal, provincial, and territorial governments to reach consensus on something that has undermined Canadian productivity for generations.
Choosing the Imperfect and Moving Forward
What I take from all of this is that it is possible to feel unsettled by how slowly domestic problems are being addressed while still recognizing that the alternatives are worse. Democracy rarely hands anyone a perfect option, and pretending otherwise sets every leader up to fail.
If you find yourself frustrated with Ottawa, it may help to ask if a realistic alternative would have handled things better. Let yourself hold both criticism and support at once, because that is an honest description of governing during difficult times. Moreover, when you talk with friends or family who disagree with you about Carney, try leading with the specific policy or result that bothers you rather than his character, since that conversation tends to be more productive.
If this helped you think through any of this, I would be grateful if you liked, shared, or subscribed, including through a paid subscription, which currently comes with a discount on annual plans. If you would rather support us without a subscription, you can also buy me a coffee. Free content like this only survives when readers choose to back it, especially as algorithm changes make it harder for independent writing to reach people who want it.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.