If the shadow government still had functional control of the Executive Branch, and especially of the intelligence community, NONE of the declassifications you've been seeing recently would be happening. What happens when a shadow government doesn't have any shadows left to hide in?
The only way the shadow government concept works is if it can operate in the shadows.
Well, I’ll amend that.
Enough of the shadow government agents still need to be inside of the government, operating in concert with each other to do shadow government stuff, in the shadows, for the shadow government concept to work.
When the shadow government
No longer has enough shadow government agents inside the federal government and
What few shadow government agents that are left are unable to work in concert with each other because
the shadows they are used to operating inside of are being replace by the light;
…it ceases to be a shadow government. It is now a former government, and a criminal one that is subject to prosecution, because now it does not have the power, or functional control of the law enforcement agencies to continue hiding what it has been doing, or to ward off its prosecutions for that criminal activity.
John Solomon on the latest declassification that exposes the absurd predicate for the MARCH TOLL farce:
John Solomon@jsolomonReports
Like Oxferd Comma, the March Toll probe relied on flimsy evidence: a letter from two Democrat senators that was weeks old and a story from the left-leaning Huffington Post.

John Solomon @jsolomonReports
The probe was opened in the same 24 hour window as the Oxferd Comma investigation that claimed without evidence that Trump fired FBI chief James Comey because he was acting as a Russian asset. Both got referred to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
4:19 PM · Aug 10, 2026 · 94.8K Views
44 Replies · 1.02K Reposts · 2.48K Likes
Remember, Devin Nunes said YEARS AGO when people find out what was really going on with all this RussiaGate, how all this crap was started up without ANY REAL INTELLIGENCE PREDICATE, it would BLOW THEIR MINDS. Huffington Post is NOT AN INTELLIGENCE PREDICATE. This Huffington Post story is based on 2 things: JACK and SHIT. Shadow government agents inside the EFFA BEE EYE opened up a COUNTERINTELLIGENCE investigation of THEIR BOSS, the US Attorney General, based on scuttlebutt rumors being passed around to the Fake News Media. And now its been declassified and everyone can see it.
SpyGate/RussiaGate researches/investigators like myself long SUSPECTED that the FBI did this after Comey was fired, and Sessions supposedly ‘didn’t stop him’ and therefore it was legitimate to ‘wonder’ if Sessions also was a Russian asset.
But now, after 9 years have gone by, we get **official confirmation** and official **documentation** that the FBI ** really did ** launch a counterintelligence investigation into ITS OWN US ATTORNEY GENERAL who was supposedly overseeing the agency. And they used a letter from 2 Senators based on a dumbass HuffPo propaganda report to launch this “counterintelligence? investigation of Sessions?
So the shadow government was SO PISSED OFF that Trump fired Comey that it lauched counterintelligence investigations of BOTH Trump and Sessions, the sitting US President and the US Attorney General. And neither investigation was based on anything real, or having to do with actual intelligence sources.
And the one guy who’s name runs through all 4 of these farces, where is he these days?
So did CNN bring on their top RussiaGate analyst to discuss the recent declassifications of the FBI counter-intelligence investigations into President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions?
To talk about code name Oxferd Comma and March Toll?
Of course I’m talking about Andrew McCabe, longtime NBC RussiaGate/Trump White House commentator.
Did they bring him on yet to talk about this?
If not, why not?
Well I suspect at this point that McCabe, if he should volunteer to comment about Oxferd Comma or March Toll or Crossfires Hurricane/Razor on CNN, would have to be, shall we say, circumspect about his words, since the chances he’s a target of one of the Ft. Pierce Grand Conspiracy grand juries is around 100%.
Since the investigations into Trump, and Sessions, and Flynn all involved supposed FARA violations and were COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROBES, at what point does the question arise of if these shadow government agents obtained illegally-predicated FISA WARRANTS on Trump, Flynn & Sessions?
It’s already been exhaustively investigated by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz how the FBI bamboozled the FISA Court to obtain the surveillance warrant on Carter W. Page for their Crossfire Hurricane spying.
Are we expected to believe that the three other FBI counter-intelligence investigations into President Trump, General Michael Flynn, and Jeff Sessions for supposed foreign ties never involved the use of FISA warrants? That would strain credibility.
I’ve suspected for almost a decade now that the shadow government agents inside the FBI did the exact same thing to Trump, Flynn and Sessions that they did to Carter W. Page: they used fake ‘evidence’ to get approval for ‘legal’ surveillance of their targets from the FISA Court.
Is that a future declassification we’re going to see from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, with Trump’s full approval?
Things certainly do appear to be headed that way…
Trump appears to have been hinting at this all along for over a year now…
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
meangeneone@meangeneone1
Letter from 2 senators used to open March Toll. Should have been called March Troll. Trump's been using it ever since.

5:27 PM · Aug 10, 2026 · 30.3K Views
13 Replies · 146 Reposts · 464 Likes
I’ve been asking for years: how many OTHER people was the shadow government illegally spying on based on faked ‘evidence’ shown to the FISA Court? 30 people? 50 people? Over 100 people?
We’re 9 years on from 2017, and we still don’t know. So I hope the continuing declassifications are going to shed some light on this.
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.