I work in audio, film and know exactly how much meticulous work Ahmad has done to produce this. It’s a total success, the clearest presentation of Escape Key’s work so far.
The good doc has clearly really boned up on the fundamentals before the interview and put in so many hours afterwards to edit the interview in a “lossless” way, removing only the (1000s apparently) of basically annoying uses of the word basically that basically destroy what is basically a vital message that the remarkable Escape Key is (self-admittedly basically) not currently built to do except through writing.
The result feels pretty much an unedited interview. For those new to Escape Key it’s a champion overview. For stalwarts like me (not a very early adopter I’m embarrassed to say) it is a helpful overview.
Escape Key’s revelations are both very simple and very complicated.
“Computer says no”
as Doc Malik says, is the whole thing in a nutshell.
A permission based world where every single transaction is decided in real time.
Escape Key has only worked with open source, sourced material. Every major player, organisation, body, school of thought examined in minute detail.
What emerged very much reminds me of Category Theory.
In Category theory, commonalities between many mathematical structures are extracted and understood. Patterns shared by groups sets, the “set of sets..” (caveat) , all manner of structures are seen to have similar core notions, identities etc…
What Escape Key has stumbled on is the inverse of this - which is very apt.
Category Theory works backwards from structures to find commonalities.
The global control that the even vaguely awake are noticing turns out to be all built round the same clearinghouse centred 5 layer pattern.
Worked out over nearly two centuries and now embedded in everything. interoperable, global, Iran, China, US, UK…
Here is my own representation of how the 5 layers work
1: Ethic layer
Things should be fair.
Anyone arguing with this is clearly not a good egg.
Since all the layers below follow from the ethics layer, anyone arguing with any of them is clearly not a good egg and frankly deserves all the restrictions they suffer.
2: Standards Layer
Faceless people set up the standards by which whether something is fair or not is decided.
These are agreed globally behind closed doors and described numerically in great and specific detail to cover all possible situations where fairness may be a question.
For example when people pay good money to go to a swanky night-club it’s really not fair for them to have to look at people in jeans. A binary valued metric is created:
0: Outside trousers are jeans
1: Outside trousers are not jeans.
Anything less than 0.5 is unacceptable.
3: The clearinghouse
Any thing you want to do, any action, is increasingly tied up with and is to be eventually totally inextricably linked with a transaction that is permission based.
The layer that applies the standards is the clearinghouse that stands between every transaction. (Don’t mention cash)
The clearinghouse is the bouncer who won’t let you in. Nothing personal just following the rules (standards). No jeans no entry. So your young daughter is in there and you want to find her. Fair enough. But you can’t go in because you’re wearing jeans.
Although, you may find that even in this instance, cash may “bypass the system”…
4. Settlement layer
From the clearinghouse layer - which comes from the standards layer - which comes after all from just being fair - comes the decision. You are told yay or nay - or - are given the financial burdens required (insurance, borrowing costs, bribe to the bouncer…) to take your chosen action.
5. Outcome layer
You have no cash. You aren’t allowed in.
Systems theory is at the heart of operations.
Hess: the ethic as central.
Marx the whole central bank concept.
Lenin the necessary ledgering.
“To fairly reward labour and spending responsibility we obviously need absolutely everything monitored and recorded”
But how to process all this data!
Enter Bogdanov and his fledgling system theory (tektology).
System theory, metrics, allow what is mistakenly called AI to handle the clearinghouse algorithmically.
No bouncer. Just an armed electromagnetic door, a camera and a jumped up calculator with a pleasantly inhuman voice.
Input about your daughter cannot even be entered.
Escape Key is essential
Even if you only subscribe for one month to Doc Malik, I reckon hearing this interview is really valuable. I didn’t even suggest such a thing for my own interview with the Doc!
But whilst you are subscribed, do listen to it if you haven’t yet! 😀
Any complaints?
There’s some areas Escape Key has not yet examined. One is a very central notion indeed - as central - or more so - than the “climate science” he understands is non-science.
In fact it has seeded the central lynchpin of the ethics layer - One Health that subsumes climate and all other global crisis subjects.
A totally bogus hypothesis for which there has never been a shred of evidence was invented a few hundred years ago - for not very kind reasons. A scam. A hoax.
Florence Nightingale on the front line said that anybody who believed in it was weak in the head.
Yet through an extraordinary series of frauds and manipulations - admirably covered in s series - we are at the stage now where the vast majority of people in the world believe a fairy-tale of extreme Grimm consequence.
Is Mickey Mouse fictional? Can we ever settle it?
There are some who still think the fictionality of viruses is a question, a discussion, a debate, when it is simply hard fact.
It is not an unanswerable question whether Mickey Mouse is fictional. No evidence exists for “his” physical existence - period. Fact.
This is how burden of proof works.
I could happily offer £95,000 for scientific proof of the existence of Mickey Mouse as a talking mouse in the real world. I’ve done sufficient work to know - it’s No Risk.
If nobody is able to find any evidence, not one shred, then Mickey Mouse is fictional.
We do not need to change our lives in any way to take account of any threat he may offer. We don’t need prophylactics in case he comes or treatments after he’s been.
Prove it!
I do not need to find any final piece of evidence to establish that Mickey Mouse is fictional.
For this very reason, 50 of us offer about £100,000 now for any evidence that any virus has ever existed. As a highlighting of the hard fact that viruses are fictional.
It’s not complicated. It’s just a fact.
We have all done the work. Between us probably over half a million hours total.
You know about Woolf in great detail. We know about virology. Mike was Global Head of Respiratory and Allergy diseases and medicines. He’s no slouch. And. He’s done the work.
We know all the details of the history of virology, the details of Enders seminal “virus isolation” in ‘54, the essential element of it, (the control that failed) being missed out from the next 70 years of identikit operations,
Serious people offer this money in good faith without any qualms because they have done the work and know there is no risk.
The Virology Control Studies Project has accurately measured the analytical specificity of the gold standard (and only) test for viruses. It is 0.0. All aspects of this silly pseudoscience have been laid bare.
It is frustrating: many are aware of the pseudoscience of the “climate emergency”, but smaller numbers are aware of the utter silliness of virology and the horrendous ongoing consequences of people believing in transmission of disease via microbe.
[shut up now, Tim, give it a rest]
Promotions to division 1
It does appear as if one of the many psyops that they cook in the tier two Rogan layer,
Gain of function,
(Ai! Ai! 😱 as the ancient Greeks would say))
is being promoted finally to the mainstream propaganda layer…along with the Alien Invasion Hoax.
Ai Ai!
Wild Speculation
Is Werner Von Braun’s final scenario going to be run?
Let’s have some fun.
Has the gain of function story been prepared for a reason? Other than to Overton window much of the mainstream-doubting layer into believing in a virus?
It took a century but the notion of infectious pathogens is fully implanted. When we see how preposterous the evidence - or rather lack evidence of it - is, we have to respect the ingeniousness of the operation. It’s breathtaking.
[I thought you were shutting up]
And now they are “admitting” in the mainstream layer about gain of function.
If humans can make a scary virus (they can’t)…
…Imagine what an AI could make!! (“It” can’t)
Or the advanced AI of an Alien Invasion force.
Ai! Ai!
😱😱
AI
To change the record, (hooray) interesting to look at these two letters.
Ai has meant different things in different cultures.
We may see Daath in the heap of ruins, Gevurah, Chesed and Kether to follow.
That’s a casusl observation.
A more interesting one is that these form the 5 main ways people respond to AI!
And as 5 main ways people respond to an Alien Invasion it’s also pretty accurate!
Werner von Braun’s final psyop, Alien Invasion : also AI.
Ai Ai
AI-WASS
Apparently some tech mystics have noted the AI bit in the name.
Nobody seems to have pointed out that
AI-WASS is a standard Digital Security acronym:
AI-Web Access Security System: A cybersecurity framework used to control, monitor, and secure user access to web applications and networks.
Ha ha! Can’t get more clearinghouse than that.
In Military intelligence it is also a standard acronym:
So AI-WASS is an AI internet gatekeeper and an AI huge surveillance system.
😀
Now Crowley didn’t draw AI-WASS but he did draw another entity he said he met called LAM
LAM is famously “like an alien” in UFO / circles (or is it the other way around? Was Crowley’s myth used as a template?)
But again no-one seems to have noticed that LAM too is a standard acronym
You have to laugh.
Ai! Ai!
🪃
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.