Honi soit qui mal y pense!

The clearing function 👆: perhaps the single most important thing everyone needs to understand.

😡😡😡

This permission based world nearly wired up is not acceptable and 99.9% of the world would utterly reject it if they understood it, which is to say, if they, for example, fully understood what esc has shone a light on.

Nobody wants this.

Who decides when we are allowed to go to the toilet? On what basis?

The clearing function in operation is the man on the door of the pub who won’t let your tiny child go in to use the toilet for a minute because it’s more than his job is worth.

Soon, if the system is fully set running, nearly every single practical decision in life for everyone will be a “may I go to the toilet?” decision.

EVERY single transaction subject to “allowance” by a global algorithmic ethics→ standards→measurement → settlement → outcome process

and so too EVERY single action!!

Because each is inextricably linked to system transactions as cash disappears and full history-carrying, permission-carrying, programable currency takes over.

Everything becomes subject to the clearing function - so it seems wise to fully understand what this universal gatekeeping mechanism is, and how it is these days only the man in the uniform doing the bidding, following the rules from others behind closed doors.

So it is worth including again esc s final (?😀) summary of this function that decides when the hatch to your cell can slide open and allow a plate of food through it.

Long? No. This is very very short! Concise and to the point. A summary of summaries of summaries written over the year.

If your future self appeared and said to you

Read this, it’s one of the most important things you will ever understand

It’s unlikely you will glance at it and say - nah, too long, can’t be bothered.

My words carry no weight but I’ll say them anyway. Read, understand and share this as if your children’s lives depended on it.

As text in a separate post:

A future for our children.

All assets tokenised and subject to beneficial ownership NOT ownership,

All actions permission based.

Nobody wants this. It proceeds only because virtually nobody understands what is written in plain sight, what is pretty much built and just “waiting” 😉 for the “right crisis” to “appear” 😉 to justify flicking the switch - for the common good.. rationing, lockdowns, end to cash, private property , your entire life as a ledger attached to a digital ID ….

All is based on the top ethics layer - created with no hint of democratic (in the best sense) input.

The ethics layer has changed several times - it is irrelevant to the control structures and to the clearing function - defined by way of standards and measurable tests.

Plug any old ethics layer to use the same clearing function.

When focus shifts to a new ethics, The old standards, and controls don’t go. They get added to.

Via the boring bureaucratic numbered ISO standards, the clearing-house is defined.

Jobsworths and clowns can man the clearing-house now - as its rules follow from the Standards.

The receptionist at the school who won’t allow you access to your child suddenly - to visit grandma before it’s too late - has no power. Just following the guidelines - to safeguard the safety of your child don’t ya know. They can be replaced with no change occurring to outcomes.

A Tedros, Van der Leyen, Trump, Gates is no different.

And these guidelines come from waaaaayyyy up the hierarchy - or at least the standards that inevitably shackle the phrasing of them do.

No funding, insurance etc… otherwise.

To challenge these automatic lower clearing-house “decisions” involves challenging those standards and hence the ethics layer.

You are against international relations. You are against healthcare for all. You are against the reduction of poverty. You are against the reduction of crime. You are against the saving of the planet for future generations. You are against protecting grandma. You are against equality. You are against world peace. You want everyone killed by a deadly virus. You are an extreme domestic terrorist.

This is an ethical system for the common good. Anyone thinking badly of it should be ashamed.

“Honi soit qui mal y pense”

I always found the story of the founding of this order pretty flimsy.

A huge major controlling not-so secret society with a sacred holy mission to help fulfil the Great Work…

…named after and carrying a motto based on picking up of a ladies garter and then grandstanding being called a sissy for it?

Seems farfetched to me.

But if this motto carries openly the key mechanism of the control apparatus

- centuries away from Hess defining it as the reason for everything

and Marx Lenin Bogadev Woolf Bernstein… …. building the clearing-house system to apply it,

That makes more sense to me.

Shame on you for thinking (and speaking) badly of this glorious new age of public-private partnership for the common good.

Thank goodness we have built six prison cities in the UK.

When the aliens invade / hamsterpox pandemic hits / organic economic crash occurs / cyberpandemic destroys communication / food supply accidentally collapses / fuel becomes a rare expensive massively stock-piled stranded asset …..

….all those not shouting

“The system needs more surveillance, control, power of seizure, algorithmic AI wiring, standards, measurements”

…can be safely locked away to ponder their shame at questioning the glorious new order.

If people knew, and talked, it would have no chance.

Nobody wants it.

Thanks for reading.

Tim

Recommendations

I recommend (free available) subscriptions to esc

and DrMikeYeadon

and Suavek

and Jamie Andrews

Please also pledge to the virus confirmation fund. It’s a no brainer to pledge - no risk. It could be 1 million by Christmas if everybody who understands that viruses are fictional pledges.

It’s a simple thing to do that costs nothing and helps shine the light over one of the central lies.

Dr Yeadon, Jerm Warfare, Jamie Andrews, Matthew North etc… are no fools. They pledge because they know there is no danger of ever having to pay the money they promise - because they have done the work.