We’re all tired. We’re all spent. We’re all scared. We’re all uncertain. There’s a particular kind of exhaustion that doesn’t show up in any wellness survey or exit interview. It settles in slowly, the way damp gets into old walls. You don’t notice it until something you touch just crumbles. That’s what sustained organizational pressure actually feels like. It doesn’t announce itself. It just quietly rots the foundation while everyone’s still showing up, still smiling, still performing the rituals of a functional team.
You first notice the rot not in the budget, or the strategic plans, or the board conversations, or even in programs or services. Nope, it shows up as something more basic and simpler and more problematic. It’s right there in your organization’s internal capacity, carried among the people who work with each other. Unless “working with” is too generous a label.
And once it’s there, it doesn’t stay contained. It leaks sideways. It shows up in tone before it shows up in outcomes. In what people stop saying before it ever becomes visible in what they fail to do.
As soon as tensions flare and grievances are aired, this is no longer about evaluation or performance reviews. That rot is already in motion.
I’m noticing more and more how, in tense times, more corrosive forces with lowered stakes come into play.
When jealousy is in the room, you know it. Somebody is eyeing your patch of grass with barely concealed hunger, protecting their turf against your progress, counting your wins against their own. It rarely announces itself cleanly. It leaks out in timing, in omissions, in who gets looped in and who doesn’t.
Favoritism starts occurring more often, and with less discretion. Managers assigning tasks to others, often in an unusual manner or at unexpected times. Teammates suddenly providing or withholding essential information. Sudden bursts of entitlement or confidence from those who’ve never had to justify a preference in their life.
These things sting, hot and hard. They are deliberate human choices, powered by ego and bias and greed. You can name them. You can fight them. You can even, sometimes, endure and beat them.
Also Read
Recognition failure, though, is a different beast. It’s what happens when processes and systems in your organization lose track of you and your work. You cease to exist in the record in any meaningful way. Not blocked, not resented, not even bypassed in favor of someone else. Just absent from the system’s memory while you are still fully present in the work. You’re not being overlooked by a person—you’re being erased by procedure.
You’re working harder, committed to a grind, carrying the burdens of others inside spaces in which you’re no longer recognized. And because there’s no clear actor to resist, it becomes harder to even name what’s happening. Your organization can’t be bothered to use its means to record or track anything that’s actually been done.
Envy is floating, and gloating, around the edges. A cold, quiet thing that fills that void. It’s not about wanting to take anything away from your colleague. It’s grief at work. Specifically, it’s the grief of watching a broken system still recognize others as you, your work and your presence fade.
Maybe it’s your team as a whole, or a colleague with whom you’re particularly close. You’re standing in the same room, doing the same work. But you don’t feel connected, or appreciated. You start questioning your own reality. You start doing the math on your own worth in ways that have nothing to do with the work and everything to do with the silence.
These two things are cold and still, and they are extraordinarily good at looking like nothing from the outside.
Your team just met to celebrate a win. The grant you wrote the proposal for just came through. The advocacy coalition you helped steer just achieved a major policy victory. You helped resolve a major internal operational roadblock.
You’re at the whiteboard with a fresh marker and you say the things all folks do in moments of nonprofit ecstasy— something like how you’re all in “synergistic alignment” with all those separate human efforts just flowing together naturally into one clean, victorious outcome. Behold the faces.
That moment of awkwardness in that room? That’s floccinaucinihilipilification — the deeply ingrained habit of deciding that someone else’s contribution doesn’t really count. It’s there because your moment of euphoric synergy threatens the survival narrative of your colleagues.
When everyone is running on empty, the acknowledgment of shared, blurred lines of credit can feel like a erasure of one’s own grueling, specialized labor. In these environments, ownership becomes a protective armor. This isn’t about bad people. No, that framing is too easy and too convenient and frankly too flattering to everyone involved.
What’s actually happening is what depletion does to groups over time. When funding is tight and burnout is the ambient weather, credit becomes the only currency anyone has left. The language of collaboration quietly exits the building.
What replaces it is something that looks almost identical from the outside but functions completely differently on the inside. Call it competitive compassion. Call it diplomatic duplicity. Call it whatever you want. You know it when you’re in it.
Also Read
I’ve seen it. I’ve lived it. The colleague who says “I’m happy to share credit on this” in the exact tone people used to reserve for opening a duel.
This particular skirmish gets fought simultaneously across every level of an organization — governance, management, coalition, peer — not as a coordinated campaign but as a kind of spontaneous structural combustion.
Everyone’s doing it to everyone else, in every direction, and nobody feels like the aggressor because nobody thinks they started it. That’s what makes it so effective at destroying things from the inside while the outside still looks fine. It’s noxious and makes everyone nauseous. And yet, there it is.
The strange thing is that each of these modern organizational crises is not particularly modern. Humans have been wrestling with recognition, belonging, scarcity, and collective survival for a very long time. Different societies have developed different ways of asking what keeps people connected when pressure arrives.
When the internal ledger turns into a weapon, another management framework won’t save you. Another workshop promising psychological safety by next quarter definitely won’t.
What might actually help is something older and less comfortable — reaching for different questions entirely about how people share space and hold each other up when the pressure is real and the resources are gone.
At a moment when the world seems intent on closing itself off, there’s every reason to think beyond the standard vocabulary of organizational development. There are older languages for this. There always have been.
There are numerous enduring ways of holding space that have protected human collectives through environments far more hostile than a mid-year budget review.
I’m going to share four distinct orientations that are in my mind this summer. Not as yet another methodology for a framework in search of yet another problem. But simply as inspiration for broader ideation when the pressure threatens to crack the foundation of a good org turning sour on itself.
These are not management models, nor are they interchangeable cultural artifacts to be borrowed at convenience. They emerge from distinct histories, experiences, and responsibilities.
I offer them here not as prescriptions but as invitations to notice how different societies have wrestled with the perennial problem of living well together. I also hope the rich social and cultural context in which they’re learned will be respected as well.
No society has solved the problem of ego, scarcity, or recognition once and for all. But different cultures have cultivated different vocabularies for responding to them. Sometimes the most valuable thing another tradition offers is not an answer but a better question.
Also Read
In Samoan and Tongan worldviews, the Vā is not an empty void or the dead space between separate entities. It is the active, sacred, relational space that holds people and communities together. In these traditions, the Vā is a living ecosystem that must be explicitly cared for.
It dictates that your professional identity is not defined by your isolated output or your siloed metrics, but by your behavior within that connective space. When a team understands the Vā, words and credit are not used to build individual heaps; they are deployed strictly to sustain the health of the shared space between us. If the space between the executive director and the program director is cluttered with unacknowledged resentment, the entire organization breathes bad air.
When survival itself is threatened by the external climate, individual hoarding becomes a literal threat to life. For thousands of years, the Inuit have maintained structural continuity in the extreme Arctic through piliriqatigiinniq—the foundational principle of working together for a common cause and collaborative decision-making.
In an environment where hunting and camp stewardship required absolute alignment of goals, acting out of isolated desire or hidden agendas meant the community starved. Piliriqatigiinniq is a survival-based reminder that when resources are scarce, the internal fight over who held the spear longest is secondary to the fact that the collective must eat.
Whanaungatanga is rooted in te ao Māori. It is the deep ethos of kinship and collective belonging forged through shared experience and mutual heritage. It systematically pulls the pedestal out from under the individual leader. There’s a nice whakataukī (proverb) that lays it out plainly: “My strength or success should not be credited to me alone, for it is not individual strength or success but that of the collective.” It establishes a baseline truth that any individual win you enjoy is merely an extension of the community that anchors your weight.
What about times when a collective faces deep, systemic fragmentation from the outside? Here, I think of something from Romani communities, phralipe, the lived ethos of intense mutual responsibility and radical solidarity. Forged through centuries of external persecution across shifting borders, phralipe ensures that no single individual or family isolates themselves from the collective welfare. It is the understanding that when the system ignores or marginalizes you, structural unity is your only defense mechanism.
None of these concepts are templates you simply copy and paste. They are older, wiser mirrors showing us the madness of our own making.
None of these concepts are templates to be imported into an internal strategy or consultant’s playbook. They belong to living communities before they can be borrowed by anyone else. But I do think there’s something they provide as a mirror or lens on how we do our work as change agents in impact spaces.
Also Read
The beach does not argue with the tide. It doesn’t attempt to consolidate the ocean into a single accountable author, nor does it convene a committee to decide which wave “owned” the shoreline’s rearrangement. Everything arrives already entangled with everything else—salt, wind, debris, foam, driftwood, footprints half-erased mid-sentence. You notice, sitting there long enough, that the most honest thing about the place is its refusal to stabilize into ownership.
What the sand teaches is not agreement but participation. Every grain is temporary evidence of contact: rock becoming small enough to be held in wind, carried across distances it never consented to map, and deposited somewhere that will also not last. Nothing here is striving to be remembered as singular. Even the horizon—so clean from a distance—breaks apart the moment you try to assign it a fixed edge. And still, nothing is careless.
The shoreline holds its form the way a practiced body holds balance: not by resisting change, but by continuously redistributing weight. Water does not ask permission, but it is not hostile; it simply arrives. The land does not claim purity from the encounter. It adjusts. It receives. It lets go. It becomes slightly different without announcing the fact.
You begin to see that stewardship is not a posture of control but a discipline of attention. To sit at the edge of something larger than you and not confuse proximity with possession. To understand that being present is already an act with consequences, and that participation always leaves a trace, even when it tries not to.
Eventually the tide pulls back and the beach looks briefly simplified, almost orderly, as if nothing happened. But the difference is still there, folded into the next moment, waiting for the next arrival to make it visible again.
On BE4SI, we’re talking nonprofits/NGOs, social enterprise, philanthropy, civil society, and social impact— filtered through U.S. and Central/Eastern European lenses. As a reader-supported publication, we’d be honored to have you as a subscriber.
SPECIAL BE4SI SUBSTACK OFFER: Black Histories in the Heart of Europe, our first book, is now available through major online booksellers. Readers can enjoy a no-frills pre-production “reader’s copy” for a just €1.99 while supplies last.
Word of mouth is essential to our growth. Please share our Substack with others. Many thanks!⚡🫶🏾 💫
Share Business English for Social Impact (BE4SI)
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.