one of the unique experiences of getting something you have wanted for a long time is how quickly it becomes the furniture of your life.
the salary that once represented security becomes the amount life now costs and your apartment that would have made an earlier version of you deliriously happy develops an annoying cupboard with insufficient storage. even achievements that matter deeply have an alarmingly short period in which they are permitted to feel extraordinary before the mind files them under normal life.
this creates an awkward problem for ambitious people because ambition depends, at least partly, on believing that something over there will improve things over here. then over there becomes here and the horizon relocates with astonishing efficiency.
this doesn’t make ambition foolish because wanting is one of the ways a life acquires direction. a person can be grateful for their work and still want to make something larger. they can love their home and want another one eventually. they can even be proud of what they’ve built while remaining curious about how far they could take it. contentment becomes unhelpful only when it is confused with having no further preferences.
birthday special: get 28% off an annual membership for the next few days. unlock the full archive, magazines, creative desk and everything coming next.
the harder question is whether a person knows how to enjoy a life that is still unfinished.
this is where i think ambition becomes less about goals and more about the relationship someone has with the gap between today and whatever comes next. some people can inhabit that gap comfortably. they want the next thing while continuing to use the good plates and book the holiday and notice that the current version of their life contains things they once begged for. others experience the gap as evidence. if the business is not large enough yet, something is wrong. or if their career has not reached a certain point by thirty, time is being lost. the future stops being somewhere to go and becomes a verdict on the present.
the distinction is easiest to see in ordinary life. imagine two people building businesses of roughly the same size who both want to double them. one spends the year interested in the problem. she experiments, gets irritated, changes her mind and occasionally has dinner without turning the conversation into a strategy meeting. the other spends the year psychologically living inside the doubled business. every current result feels disappointing because it is being compared with a reality that does not exist yet.
from the outside, both look ambitious. internally, only one gets to have the year.
this is why i have become suspicious of goals that require contempt for the current version of things. hating the body can produce a fitness plan and hating the job can produce extraordinary work. embarrassment about money can produce a ferocious appetite for earning it. these motives are effective, which is partly why they are difficult to question. the bill occurs later, when the thing improves and the mind discovers that dissatisfaction has become its preferred method of generating momentum.
then enough becomes remarkably difficult to recognise.
the number moves and the standard moves with it. an income that once meant freedom begins to feel precarious after the people around you start earning more. ten thousand readers feels enormous until fifty thousand becomes imaginable. the reference point changes so smoothly that very little greed is required. human beings are simply excellent at acclimatising to their own good fortune.
for this reason, “enough” is better decided in advance.
before the next milestone, it helps to write down what you expect it to change. more money might mean no longer worrying about a particular expense or a larger business might mean hiring help. greater recognition might open a specific kind of opportunity. the exercise sounds painfully practical, which is helpful because ambition enjoys vague promises. “everything will feel different when…” can survive almost any amount of evidence. “i want this because it will allow me to work four days a week” can eventually be checked.
once the goal arrives, the original promise should be collected.
this is where many ambitious lives become unintentionally absurd. somebody works for years to earn enough for greater freedom and responds to earning it by working more. another wants success so she can choose her projects and then becomes successful enough that she is afraid to decline any of them. the achievement delivers the promised freedom and ambition immediately puts the freedom back to work.
contentment sometimes requires refusing to reinvest every gain.
keep the afternoon that success bought and take the trip the savings were supposedly for. let the bigger team remove something from your workload instead of using the new capacity to manufacture more workload. when life improves, allow at least part of the improvement to reach the person who did all that work.
i also think every serious ambition needs a cost ceiling. most people have a target for what they want to gain and very little clarity about what they are unwilling to lose. this makes almost any sacrifice defensible while the goal remains sufficiently exciting.
a cost ceiling sounds like this: i want the business to grow, although i do not want growth that routinely removes dinner with my family. i want to become excellent at this work, although i am unwilling to spend five years being miserable to prove it. i want more money, although i do not want every hobby turned into another possible revenue stream.
the ceiling forces ambition to become more intelligent. constraints create the question that endless growth avoids: how do i get more of what i want without casually spending what i already value?
that question has become more useful to me than the usual advice to “be grateful for what you have.” gratitude is lovely, although it can become another moral instruction people use against themselves. somebody can appreciate a good life and still feel restless. and restlessness contains information. perhaps a part of life genuinely needs to grow or the next project is worth making simply because finding out whether it can exist sounds fun.
contentment only needs to stop ambition from rewriting the meaning of everything that came before.
a helpful test is to look at an ordinary weekday rather than the imagined finish line. most ambitions are sold to us through exceptional moments: signing the deal, publishing the book, opening the email, seeing the number, getting that bonus check. very little of a life occurs there. a life occurs during the thousands of unphotographed days required to reach them.
if the goal succeeds, those days were still your life.
so the question becomes less “how badly do i want this?” and more “do i want the days required to pursue it?” a worthwhile ambition should make enough of those days interesting, purposeful or satisfying that the years spent reaching for it do not feel like a fee paid for permission to enjoy yourself later.
perhaps ambition and contentment coexist most comfortably when neither is asked to defeat the other. ambition can say, i would like to see how far this goes. contentment can answer, and this already counts.
the second sentence is what keeps the first one from swallowing a life.
the birthday offer is live: 28% off a full year of milk & cookies.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.