Pseudo-national Imperialism

At the end of my previous article on Iran's cryptocracy, I asked the question: WHY maintain a facade State even after the globalist powers have fully captured the government and economy of a country? This article will provide a broad explanation that, as it turns out, has applicability for many (if not all) imperial States of the post-medieval era. The following is a brief model of the modus operandi of what I might term "pseudo-national imperialism" employed by the globalist elites in the modern world.

1. International elites secretly co-opt, through financial influence, elite intermarriage, blackmail, and propaganda, the strongest ethnos/nation of a region.

2. This dominant ethnos is 'empowered' with imperialist ideology and given broad incentives for full participation in the imperial project (power, status, wealth, and privileges) whereby the elites use the nation to aggressively expand and advance their own agenda. It should be noted, however, that the ethno-nationalist imperialism used to rally the dominant ethnos in this capacity is itself subtly deracinated. The traditional, native culture of the dominant ethnos is typically decorporealized and abstracted into representing objectivity, universality, 'common sense', and civilization as a whole. In this manner, the dominant ethnos is already primed for an eventual controlled demolition.

3. The dominant ethnos reaches their limits of usefulness by conquering all rival traditional or ethnic hierarchies (internal and external) with independent power. These rival groups become deracinated "oppressed masses" under the control of the dominant ethnos of the empire.

4. "Oppressed masses" then get re-empowered under new cryptocracy-invented and controlled ideological movements (socialism, republicanism, etc.), while the previously dominant ethnos is simultaneously demoralized and dethroned in various ways (wars, financial collapses, demographic replacement, propaganda, etc.), leveling them with the previously "oppressed masses" and finalizing the total control of the region by the globalist elite.

I believe this model applies to numerous modern State projects across the world, but in this article we will focus on a handful of the most important examples: Iran, the British Empire, French empire, USSR, and USA.

However, an important caveat I'd like to stress before diving into examples is the following: the rise and fall of an empire in accordance with the pattern mentioned above is not sufficient evidence to prove that the entire process was guided by the hidden hand of international Jewry. Crucially, genealogical and biographical investigations of key figures in the rise and fall of the empire at hand must be made, and relevant connections must be established. The theory cannot be justified without this genealogical component in place first, hence the importance of a close reading of the visible powers at play in crucial moments of an empire’s growth and decline.

Final note before beginning— these plans are broad and span multiple generations. Lots of improvisation and changes of plans necessarily occur; opinions on strategy and tactics vary and produce competing camps. Of course it is not perfectly cut and dry in reality, but the fact remains that a grand vision and overall mode of operation can persist across multiple generations.

As said in the Kohelet Rabbah:

“Just as my ancestors planted for me, I too plant for my children.”

And in the Zohar:

“The world is healed by human deeds… The Shekinah is uplifted through successive generations.”

The entire story of Moses too, one of the most central teachings of Judaism, proves the importance they hold in working through generations.

The fact that so many of our people cannot fathom this kind of intergenerational action is one of our greatest weaknesses and disadvantages compared to them.

Rome was, in my opinion, the first time in history that an empire was destroyed intentionally by cryptocratic Jewry via royal infiltration, economic catastrophes, and mass migration… rather than being openly defeated by a visible external power. Unlike modern Empires, which were pseudo-nationalist from the start, Rome began as a genuine nationalist power, ruled by authentic Roman Royalty, supported by an authentic core Patriot class. Hence, its rise was organic and spontaneous… but its fall was the first time the latter half of the model I am presenting was manifested in reality.