- Title
- Ambiguity in late-specified return type
- Status
- cd2
- Section
- 9.3 [dcl.decl]
- Submitter
- Daveed Vandevoorde
Created on 2009-02-09.00:00:00 last changed 199 months ago
Messages
Date: 2009-07-15.00:00:00
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Date: 2009-06-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (June, 2009): See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
Date: 2009-02-09.00:00:00
It is currently unspecified whether a declaration like should be parsed as a declaration of f whose return type
is a class definition (which will be ill-formed according to
9.2.9 [dcl.type] paragraph 3) or as a definition of
f whose return type is an
elaborated-type-specifier.
f() -> struct S { };
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2259 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2009-06-19 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2040 |
| 2009-06-19 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2009-02-09 00:00:00 | admin | create | |