- Title
- Terminology of zero-initialization
- Status
- tc1
- Section
- 9.5 [dcl.init]
- Submitter
- Valentin Bonnard
Created on 1999-08-04.00:00:00 last changed 284 months ago
Messages
Date: 2000-04-15.00:00:00
Notes from 04/00 meeting:
There is significant overlap between this issue and
issue 178; the proposed wording must be
reconciled before either resolution can be adopted.
Date: 2000-10-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (10/00):
Delete the words "The storage for" from the first sentence of
6.10.3.2 [basic.start.static] paragraph 1.
[Note: Revised wording in 9.5 [dcl.init]
relating to this issue is also found
in issue 178.]
Date: 2016-02-15.00:00:00
In 6.10.3.2 [basic.start.static] paragraph 1
and
9.5 [dcl.init]
paragraphs 5 and 6, the
terms "memory" and "storage" are used in connection with
zero-initialization. This is inaccurate; it is the variables that are
zero-initialized, not the storage. (An all-zero bit pattern in the
storage may, in fact, not correspond to the representation of zero
converted to the appropriate type, and it is the latter that is being
described.) Suggested resolution: remove the words "storage" and "memory" in
these contexts.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2003-04-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> tc1 |
| 2000-11-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2000-05-21 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg334 |
| 2000-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg225 |
| 2000-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
| 1999-08-04 00:00:00 | admin | create | |