01
Contribution score
PRs × 8 + Issues × 3 + Commits × 1. This formula recognizes public GitHub activity while acknowledging that reviews, triage, discussions, and maintainer context require additional judgment.
Assessment methodology
How ecosystem support is assessed
The current public model tracks contribution activity across 63 repositories and pairs metrics with review before support decisions are published.
Method status
Published inputs before rankings
Scores and allocations should not appear as public rankings until their data sources, time window, eligibility policy, and review limits are documented for the relevant reporting period.
Scoring model
Evidence is useful only when its limits are visible.
02
Library impact
Funding review can consider ecosystem footprint, maintenance load, security posture, documentation, community benefit, and the role a project plays across React workflows.
03
Funding distribution
When an approved pool exists, distribution can be proportional to contribution scores and impact metrics after eligibility review. Public pages should identify the reporting period, inputs, limits, and any material human judgment.
04
Human review
Metrics structure the process but do not replace maintainer feedback, community input, or governance review.