. 2013 Sep;4(5):521-528.
doi: 10.1177/1948550612468774. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Rong Su 2 , Hong Li 3 , Moon-Ho Ringo Ho 4 , Sungjin Hong 2 , Tarcan Kumkale 5 , Sarah D Stauffer 6 , Gregory Zecca 6 , Huajian Cai 7 , Sonia Roccas 8 , Javier Arce-Michel 9 , Cristina de Sousa 10 , Rolando Diaz-Loving 11 , Maria Mercedes Botero 12 , Lucia Mannetti 13 , Claudia Garcia 14 , Pilar Carrera 15 , Amparo Cabalero 15 , Masatake Ikemi 16 , Darius Chan 17 , Allan Bernardo 18 , Fernando Garcia 19 , Inge Brechan 20 , Greg Maio 21 , Dolores Albarracín 22
Affiliations
- PMID: 30147848
- PMCID: PMC6103533
- DOI: 10.1177/1948550612468774
Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism
Ethan Zell et al. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013 Sep.
Abstract
The current research examined whether nations differ in their attitudes toward action and inaction. It was anticipated that members of dialectical East Asian societies would show a positive association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. However, members of non-dialectical European-American societies were expected to show a negative association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. Young adults in 19 nations completed measures of dialectical thinking and attitudes toward action/inaction. Results from multi-level modeling showed, as predicted, that people from high dialecticism nations reported a more positive association in their attitudes toward action and inaction than people from low dialecticism nations. Furthermore, these findings remained after controlling for cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, neuroticism, gross-domestic product, and response style. Discussion highlights the implications of these findings for action/inaction goals, dialecticism, and culture.
Keywords: action research; attitudes; attitudinal ambivalence; culture and cognition; culture/ethnicity.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Goetz JL, Spencer-Rodgers J, Peng K. Dialectical emotions: How cultural epistemologies influence the experience and regulation of emotional complexity. In: Sorrentino RM, Yamaguchi S, editors. Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2008. pp. 517–538.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources