8 emulators 998 tests
Results as of this run. The arrow shows each target's movement since the previous run it was tested in.
When this run was published the board led with a single correctness percentage. The figures here are that run's own results restated as divergence and coverage, so they read differently from what this page showed at the time. The changelog has the change.
-
Tier breakdown
Grade baseline
no divergence in all 33 regions · covers 100.0% of the suite
ground truth
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
-
Tier breakdown
Grade A
no divergence in 6 regions · up to 0.3% in the other 27 · covers 98.6% of the suite · coverage lowers this row to A
diverged 5.2 percentage points less
Also built for WebAssembly / OPFSTier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges
93.0% covered 14 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
-
Grade B
no divergence in 6 regions · up to 0.3% in the other 26 · covers 78.7% · coverage lowers this row to B
-
-
Tier breakdown
Grade A
low divergence (1.6%) in all 33 regions · covers 91.3% of the suite
diverged 13.7 percentage points less
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 3.5% diverges
58.3% covered 83 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 2.8% diverges
98.8% covered 4 unsupported
-
Tier breakdown
Grade C
moderate divergence (12.3%) in 27 regions · up to 12.5% in the other 6 · covers 80.0% of the suite · coverage lowers this row to C
diverged 9.0 percentage points less
Tier 1 · Core 8.6% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 14.1% diverges
20.1% covered 159 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 16.7% diverges
87.3% covered 41 unsupported
-
Tier breakdown
Grade C
high divergence (15.6%) in 27 regions · up to 15.7% in the other 6 · covers 99.2% of the suite
diverged 0.1 percentage points less
Tier 1 · Core 6.5% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 18.1% diverges
96.0% covered 8 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 27.5% diverges
100.0% covered
-
Tier breakdown
Grade C
high divergence (15.9%) in 27 regions · up to 16.0% in the other 6 · covers 97.9% of the suite
diverged 0.9 percentage points less
Tier 1 · Core 7.8% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 16.1% diverges
89.4% covered 21 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 27.8% diverges
100.0% covered
-
Tier breakdown
Grade C
high divergence (18.0%) in all 33 regions · covers 100.0% of the suite
unchanged
Tier 1 · Core 10.9% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 29.6% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 3 · Strict 21.3% diverges
100.0% covered
-
Tier breakdown
Grade C
high divergence (20.9%) in all 33 regions · covers 99.1% of the suite
unchanged
Tier 1 · Core 8.6% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 36.7% diverges
95.5% covered 9 unsupported
Tier 3 · Strict 29.3% diverges
100.0% covered