Async exports

https://github.com/amdjs/amdjs-api/issues/17580410 On Monday, April 7, 2014 at 12:59:58 AM UTC-5

lockandload (Yet another AMD-loader)

Something I wrote back in 2014, but didn't get a chance to opensource until recently: https://www

lodJS a JavaScript module loader, based on AMD. So far, the best understanding of the AMD

https://github.com/yanhaijing/lodjs

An attempt at secure AMD: caution.js

Sounds good, definitely. I think there are two things I'd like to see: * an AMD/CommonJS module

Do loaders need a way to initiate module resolution other than "define?"

an example that's fairly easy to reason about is that after building your source files, you end

Re: [amd-implement] Re: Common configuration draft

Where is this configuration info supposed to go? Couldn't find anything addressing that in the

Minimal AMD loader

Working on a minimal AMD loader. It's fairly complete (only missing thing I know of is no support

"this" in AMD callback

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM, James Burke <jrb...@gmail.com> wrote: For that reason, if we

Spec docs moved to repo

Definitely seems like an improvement to me, James. +1 -- John On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, James

Re: [amd-implement] AMD delivering ES6 modules

An important correction: I received a private note indicating that the ES designers did not ignore

AUTO: Dan Dumont is out of the office 10/19/2009 (returning 02/24/2014)

I am out of the office until 02/24/2014. Please contact Steve Mark if you need something right away.

Precise ID matching in AMD configs

Following up on Guy's suggestion of a “layers” config, I went with calling it “bundles” config

How to distinguish is dependencies module or not dependencies module?

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jeson Xu <xuzhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > //I have two

Redefine: Testing AMD Modules Without A Loader

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jakob Heuser <ja...@felocity.com> wrote: > Thanks James. I

Real-world loader interoperability challenges

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Colin Snover <goo...@zetafleet.com> wrote: >> 2. Code

Best practices for keeping AMD modules portable with CommonJS

Check the documentation of uRequire that lists (and solves) the various issues and incompatibilities

The AMD spec needs require.registry (or require.defined, or require.bikeshed)

Hey Devin, I can certainly understand why you'd want a feature like this. At one point, I thought

Split API spec for modules and loader?

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Mike Wilson <mik...@gmail.com> wrote: > The AMD API

Re: [amd-implement] Digest for amd-implement@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jakob Heuser <ja...@felocity.com> wrote: > In the spec, we

Request quick code review of pull request for backbone.googlemaps

Hi amd-js experts, I know you are probably all extremely busy, so I will keep this brief. I created a

Plugin questions...

Hey John, Thanks. Using Require JS at the moment. Just can't figure it out... so I will try to

AMD Spec Enhancement: onResourceLoad

Reading the draft specs might be a place to start. That is how I am starting, and trying to make some

Router Plugin - AMD in Multi Page Web Apps

Hey, Yeah that is very similar to my plugin. I agree an inline module probably does provide more

Test multiple defines in the same script

Yea, when I get time I'll make a test. On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 4:10:48 PM UTC-4, James Burke

jQuery named defines

Yes I understand there are tradeoffs to be made, and I believe that the decision for jQuery to have a

Announcement: JavaScript Aggregator project 1.0.0 release.

We are pleased to announce the first release of the JavaScript Aggregator project. The JavaScript

Looking to merge pull request 19

I've have heard from Jakob who had a good suggestion. It's passing the tests via the travis

Upcoming Test Changes: define() test w/o dependencies, anon_relative

Jakob, I think there is an issue with the new test. It's assuming that loaders are following

New amdjs-tests official, all current frameworks passing + Spec Discussion

Hi John, Sorry, didn't mean to pollute the thread. I just noticed it was touched on in this

Re: [amd-implement] Re: NodeJS AMD support (was Re: [requirejs] mootools future support to AMD modules!)

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Rawld Gill <rg...@altoviso.com> wrote: > I agree with