Contributor
uatach
changed the title
Fix 'time zone' spelling issues across datetime.rst
gh-85453: Fix 'time zone' spelling issues across datetime.rst
Closed
Member
I think timezone is also an acceptable spelling, if that's what we've been consistently using, we should probably continue using that.
Alternatively, we could differentiate between datetime.timezone (the class) and the more abstract notion of a "time zone" by including the space for the abstract notion, but I'm more inclined to mark out references to the class with backticks / class references rather than a spelling difference.
Contributor Author
I think timezone is also an acceptable spelling, if that's what we've been consistently using, we should probably continue using that.
I'm not sure... the IANA database uses "time zone" and both Wikipedia and The Free Dictionary redirect "timezone" to "time zone"... so maybe "timezone" isn't even valid spelling but people use it anyway?
Alternatively, we could differentiate between
datetime.timezone(the class) and the more abstract notion of a "time zone" by including the space for the abstract notion, but I'm more inclined to mark out references to the class with backticks / class references rather than a spelling difference.
Yes, I tried to differentiate all of them (the class and the instances and objects of the class) from the abstract concept.
Contributor
@uatach, I'll have a look in the next couple of days.
Contributor
Alternatively, we could differentiate between
datetime.timezone(the class) and the more abstract notion of a "time zone" by including the space for the abstract notion, but I'm more inclined to mark out references to the class with backticks / class references rather than a spelling difference.
I think it would be an improvement to consistently use spell it "time zone" in the prose; it would help separate the class from the abstract concept even more.
Both spelling variants are used across the Python docs; I think we would benefit from a consistent spelling all across the docs. Moreover, most dictionaries seem to use "time zone", and as long as that is true, we're bound to get "spelling correction PRs" from time to time.
Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks; I believe this is an improvement. I'll await a few days before landing to give Paul time to chime in, in case he really don't want this to go in.
Member
Should we also recommend "date and time", or is "datetime" better because it's compact and people will understand what we mean?
Contributor
Should we also recommend "date and time", or is "datetime" better because it's compact and people will understand what we mean?
With the "time zone" / "timezone" clarification in place, it would also make sense to clarify "datetime" / "date and time", IMO.
Contributor
Anyway, I read python/devguide#1352 as a blessing from the EB to go forth with this PR.
Sorry it took so long to land this, @uatach; thanks for your good work!
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
Jul 16, 2024…etime.rst (pythonGH-118449) (cherry picked from commit 1755df7 ) Co-authored-by: edson duarte <eduarte.uatach@gmail.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
Jul 16, 2024…etime.rst (pythonGH-118449) (cherry picked from commit 1755df7 ) Co-authored-by: edson duarte <eduarte.uatach@gmail.com>
erlend-aasland pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Jul 16, 2024erlend-aasland pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Jul 23, 2024