eml(x, y) = exp(x) − ln(y) — one binary operator. Open problem: can sin(x) be constructed from it?
Based on arXiv:2603.21852 (Odrzywołek, 2026).
Challenge board: monogate.dev · ·
·
pip install monogate # core — no dependencies pip install "monogate[sympy]" # + symbolic simplification
Quick start — expression construction
from monogate import BEST, best_optimize, CBEST, im # BEST routing — cheapest gate per operation BEST.pow(2.0, 10.0) # 1024.0 (EXL, 3 nodes vs 15) BEST.div(6.0, 2.0) # 3.0 (EDL, 1 node vs 15) BEST.ln(2.718) # ~1.0 (EXL, 1 node vs 3) # Complex BEST — sin and cos in 1 node via Euler path import math im(CBEST.sin(math.pi / 6)) # 0.5 (= sin(π/6), exact) # Code optimizer — rewrite any Python/NumPy/PyTorch expression r = best_optimize("torch.sin(x)**2 + torch.cos(x) * x**3") print(r.rewritten_code) # 72% fewer nodes
Interactive web demo (Streamlit): — Optimizer · Special Functions · PINN Demo · MCTS Explorer · Phantom Attractor
Run locally:
pip install -r requirements-streamlit.txt streamlit run streamlit_app.py
For Researchers
Challenge board: monogate.dev — submit a construction for sin, cos, π, or i. Get credited permanently.
Theorem catalog: monogate.dev/theorems — every result labeled honestly: theorem, conjecture, observation, or speculation.
Open problems:
- Construct sin(x) from eml(x,y) using only grammar terminals {1, x}
- Construct i (the imaginary unit) from terminal {1} alone
- Prove or disprove: the EML depth hierarchy has no level 4
Reproduce the paper results:
git clone https://github.com/agent-maestro/monogate cd monogate make reproduce-n11 # verify N=11 exhaustive search (~30s from cache) make reproduce-all # full readiness check make paper # compile preprint.tex (requires TeX Live)
Cite:
@misc{monogate2026, title = {monogate: Universal Expression Trees from a Single Binary Operator}, author = {[Author]}, year = {2026}, eprint = {ARXIV_ID_PLACEHOLDER}, archivePrefix = {arXiv}, }
The sin(x) barrier
Theorem (Infinite Zeros Barrier): No finite real-valued EML tree with terminals {1, x} equals sin(x) for all x ∈ ℝ.
Proof: Every EML tree is real-analytic → finitely many zeros. sin has zeros at {kπ : k ∈ ℤ}. Contradiction.
Empirical confirmation: 208,901,719 trees evaluated (N ≤ 11, ~5 min on one CPU core). Best near-miss MSE: 1.478e-4.
Complex bypass (1 node, exact): Im(eml(ix, 1)) = Im(exp(ix)) = sin(x).
SuperBEST v5 routing table (all 10 entries proved optimal)
| Operation | Construction | SB nodes | Naive EML | Saving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| exp | EML(x,1) | 1 | 1 | — |
| ln | EXL(0,x) | 1 | 3 | −2 |
| e^−x | DEML(0,x) | 1 | 5 | −4 |
| recip | ELSb(0,x) | 1 | 5 | −4 |
| div | ELSb(ln x, y) | 2 | 15 | −13 |
| neg | EXL(0,DEML(0,x)) | 2 | 9 | −7 |
| mul | ELAd(EXL(0,x),y) | 2 | 13 | −11 |
| sub | LEdiv(x,EML(y,1)) | 2 | 5 | −3 |
| add | LEdiv(x,DEML(y,1)) | 2 | 8 | −6 |
| pow | EML(EXL(0,x)·n,1) | 3 | 15 | −12 |
Total: 18 nodes (SuperBEST v5) vs 73 (naive EML) — 75.3% fewer. (ADD-T1)
16 exp-ln operators classified: 8 exactly complete, 1 approximately complete (EMN), 7 incomplete. (T24–T28)
Research by Arturo R. Almaguer.
When to use it
monogate is the right tool when your workload:
- Does symbolic regression or interpretable expression search
- Is dominated by
pow,ln,mul, ordiv(all save ≥6 nodes each) - Uses sin/cos activations (NeRF, SIREN, Fourier features, physics ML)
- Needs human-readable formula output from a differentiable tree
monogate is not a PyTorch inference accelerator. Native torch.sin is ~9,000× faster than any EML variant. The EML substrate computes in Python scalars. It is the right tool for symbolic analysis, formula construction, interpretable regression, and mathematical research.
Install
pip install monogate # core — no dependencies pip install "monogate[sympy]" # + prover (SymPy exact tier) pip install "monogate[torch]" # + EMLTree, EMLNetwork, HybridNetwork pip install "monogate[llm]" # + LLM-guided optimizer
JavaScript / Node:
npm install monogate
Repository structure
monogate/
├── python/ # pip install monogate
│ ├── monogate/ # core library
│ ├── tests/ # 1184 tests
│ ├── notebooks/ # tutorials + prover_showcase.ipynb
│ └── docs/ # MkDocs site
├── lib/ # npm install monogate — JS/Node library
├── explorer/ # monogate.dev — Vite/React browser app
├── THEORY.md # formal theorem/conjecture reference
├── Makefile # make reproduce-all, make test, make docker-run
└── Dockerfile # clean-room reproducibility environment
Research Notes
Detailed working documents, raw session logs, and full research context are maintained in a private repository for cleanliness and strategic reasons.
Public artifacts in this repo include:
python/paper/preprint.tex— the authoritative arXiv preprintpython/notebooks/— clean, reproducible session benchmarkspython/results/— benchmark outputs and figurespython/monogate/— the full Python librarycapability_card.json— machine-readable capability profile
License
MIT. The underlying mathematics is CC BY 4.0 per the original paper.