@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ But their optimal decision rules determine the probability $\lambda$ of leaving
|
310 | 310 | This is now |
311 | 311 | |
312 | 312 | ```{math} |
313 | | -:label: lake_lamda |
| 313 | +:label: endogenous_lake_lambda |
314 | 314 | |
315 | 315 | \lambda |
316 | 316 | = \gamma \mathbb P \{ w_t \geq \bar w\} |
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ The lump-sum tax applies to everyone, including unemployed workers.
|
365 | 365 | For each specification $(c, \tau)$ of government policy, we can solve for the |
366 | 366 | worker's optimal reservation wage. |
367 | 367 | |
368 | | -This determines $\lambda$ via {eq}`lake_lamda` evaluated at post tax wages, |
| 368 | +This determines $\lambda$ via {eq}`endogenous_lake_lambda` evaluated at post tax wages, |
369 | 369 | which in turn determines a steady state unemployment rate $u(c, \tau)$. |
370 | 370 | |
371 | 371 | For a given level of unemployment benefit $c$, we can solve for a tax that balances the budget in the steady state |
|