@@ -424,13 +424,14 @@ def evaluate_largest(v_hat, array, order=1):
424424425425We can check the accuracy of our `evaluate_largest` method by comparing it with an analytical solution.
426426427-We find that despite small discrepancy, the evaluate_largest method functions well.
428-429-Furthermore, if we take a very large number of auctions, say 1 million, the discrepancy disappears.
427+We find that the `evaluate_largest` method functions well
430428431429```{code-cell} ipython3
432-v_grid = np.linspace(0.3,1,8)
433-bid_analytical = b_star(v_grid,N)
430+v_grid = np.linspace(0.3, 1, 8)
431+bid_analytical = b_star(v_grid, N)
432+433+# Redraw valuations
434+v = np.random.uniform(0, 1, (N, R))
434435bid_simulated = [evaluate_largest(ii, v) for ii in v_grid]
435436436437fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6, 4))