@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ At the same time, these concepts are extremely useful for
3535* machine learning
3636* and many other fields of science.
373738-In this lecture we explain the basics of eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
38+In this lecture we explain the basics of eigenvalues and eigenvectors and introduce the Neumann Series Lemma.
39394040We assume in this lecture that students are familiar with matrices
4141 and understand {doc}`the basics of matrix algebra<linear_equations>`.
@@ -791,7 +791,6 @@ When solving $Av = \lambda v$,
791791792792We will see some examples below.
793793794-795794### Some mathematical details
796795797796We note some mathematical details for more advanced readers.
@@ -813,8 +812,6 @@ in $\lambda$ of degree $n$.
813812This in turn implies the existence of $n$ solutions in the complex
814813plane, although some might be repeated.
815814816-817-818815### Facts
819816820817Some nice facts about the eigenvalues of a square matrix $A$ are as follows:
@@ -857,6 +854,118 @@ The eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a map $A$ determine how a vector $v$ is tran
857854858855This is discussed further later.
859856857+858+(la_neumann)=
859+## The Neumann Series Lemma
860+861+```{index} single: Neumann's Lemma
862+```
863+864+In this section we present a famous result about series of matrices that has
865+many applications in economics.
866+867+### Scalar series
868+869+Here's a fundamental result about series that you surely know:
870+871+If $a$ is a number and $|a| < 1$, then
872+873+```{math}
874+:label: gp_sum
875+876+ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a^k =\frac{1}{1-a} = (1 - a)^{-1}
877+878+```
879+880+For a one-dimensional linear equation $x = ax + b$ where x is unknown we can thus conclude that the solution $x^{*}$ is given by:
881+882+$$
883+ x^{*} = \frac{b}{1-a} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a^k b
884+$$
885+886+### Matrix series
887+888+A generalization of this idea exists in the matrix setting.
889+890+Consider the system of equations $x = Ax + b$ where $A$ is an $n \times n$
891+square matrix and $x$ and $b$ are both column vectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
892+893+Using matrix algebra we can conclude that the solution to this system of equations will be given by:
894+895+```{math}
896+:label: neumann_eqn
897+898+ x^{*} = (I-A)^{-1}b
899+900+```
901+902+What guarantees the existence of a unique vector $x^{*}$ that satisfies
903+{eq}`neumann_eqn`?
904+905+The following is a fundamental result in functional analysis that generalizes
906+{eq}`gp_sum` to a multivariate case.
907+908+(neumann_series_lemma)=
909+```{prf:Theorem} Neumann Series Lemma
910+:label: neumann_series_lemma
911+912+Let $A$ be a square matrix and let $A^k$ be the $k$-th power of $A$.
913+914+Let $r(A)$ be the **spectral radius** of $A$, defined as $\max_i |\lambda_i|$, where
915+916+* $\{\lambda_i\}_i$ is the set of eigenvalues of $A$ and
917+* $|\lambda_i|$ is the modulus of the complex number $\lambda_i$
918+919+Neumann's Theorem states the following: If $r(A) < 1$, then $I - A$ is invertible, and
920+921+$$
922+(I - A)^{-1} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} A^k
923+$$
924+```
925+926+We can see the Neumann Series Lemma in action in the following example.
927+928+```{code-cell} ipython3
929+A = np.array([[0.4, 0.1],
930+ [0.7, 0.2]])
931+932+evals, evecs = eig(A) # finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors
933+934+r = max(abs(λ) for λ in evals) # compute spectral radius
935+print(r)
936+```
937+938+The spectral radius $r(A)$ obtained is less than 1.
939+940+Thus, we can apply the Neumann Series Lemma to find $(I-A)^{-1}$.
941+942+```{code-cell} ipython3
943+I = np.identity(2) #2 x 2 identity matrix
944+B = I - A
945+```
946+947+```{code-cell} ipython3
948+B_inverse = np.linalg.inv(B) #direct inverse method
949+```
950+951+```{code-cell} ipython3
952+A_sum = np.zeros((2,2)) #power series sum of A
953+A_power = I
954+for i in range(50):
955+ A_sum += A_power
956+ A_power = A_power @ A
957+```
958+959+Let's check equality between the sum and the inverse methods.
960+961+```{code-cell} ipython3
962+np.allclose(A_sum, B_inverse)
963+```
964+965+Although we truncate the infinite sum at $k = 50$, both methods give us the same
966+result which illustrates the result of the Neumann Series Lemma.
967+968+860969## Exercises
861970862971```{exercise}