F Zero Photography

Pinhole adventures #3 – unexpected results

29.6. 2024

I usually semi-stand develop my pinhole pictures in Foma Fomadon R09, which is as far as I know, basically rodinal. Results I got with this combination are low contrast and most of the time pretty heavy bromide drag, especially from sprocket holes.

This is typical result I get this way. No contrast added just inverted colors. For my “final” picture I add a relatively lot of contrast at least.

Foma 200, Fomadon R09, semi-stand, no post adjustments

Now, I don’t mind adding contrast, but the sprocket bromide drag really bothers me. That is the main reason I don’t really like stand development – that I haven’t found a way to get rid of it consistently. So I tried other developers ( Fomadon LQR), stopped using stand development whenever I can and develop the standard way, according to developer manufacturer. And I like results – very good contrast and no bromide drag.

But I cannot develop my pinhole pictures standard way – stand development levels the exposure mistakes, which I surely make a lot since I estimate exposure times very loosely. I don’t use any meter and even any stopwatch, i just count.

This time I developed my pinhole pictures with Adox Adonal, which is as far as I know, also basically rodinal. I stand developed it but with three agitations every 15 minutes. I tried this also with mentioned Fomadon R09 with no real advantage, but this time, with Adonal, no bromide drag and very contrasty images! And the grain how i like it.

I added no contrast to this picture in post. Just inverted colors and did minor distortion correction and added border.

Foma 200, Adonal, semi-stand with 3 inversions every 15 mins.

Basically, I have no idea what is going on. Negative is pretty dark and contrasty, absolutely no bromide drag. I’m a little bit flabbergasted. Results looks like if I developed them the with standard times and with contrasty Fomadon LQR. I really like them!

Also, no camera shake, velcro zip tying camera to things works nicely.

So, there we go. I got some thinking to do and more tests to do. I’m not sure I can solve this mystery and reproduce these results, but I surely would like to. Was exposure in camera better? Is my bottle Foma R09 old and weak? Is Adonal just this good? So many variables…


There is no comment section here, but we can email like in the ancient times!