ASAF KARAGILA (a1) · Cambridge Core

Abstract

J. L. Krivine developed a new method based on realizability to construct models of set theory where the axiom of choice fails. We attempt to recreate his results in classical settings, i.e., symmetric extensions. We also provide a new condition for preserving well ordered, and other particular type of choice, in the general settings of symmetric extensions.

References

Banaschewski, B. and Moore, G. H., The dual Cantor-Bernstein theorem and the partition principle. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 31 (1990), no. 3, pp. 375381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blass, A. and Scedrov, A., Freyd’s models for the independence of the axiom of choice. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 79 (1989), no. 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontanella, L. and Geoffroy, G., Preserving cardinals and weak forms of Zorn’s lemma in realizability models, preprint, 2019.Google Scholar

Grigorieff, S., Intermediate submodels and generic extensions in set theory. Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 101 (1975), pp. 447490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jech, T., Set Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.Google Scholar

Jech, T. J., The Axiom of Choice, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 75, North-Holland, Amsterdam-London; Amercan Elsevier, New York, 1973.Google Scholar

Karagila, A., Iterating symmetric extensions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 84 (2019), no. 1, pp. 123159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karagila, A., Preserving dependent choice. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematics, vol. 67 (2019), no. 1, pp. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krivine, J.-L., Realizability algebras II: New models of ZF + DC. Logical Methods in Computer Science, vol. 8 (2012), no. 1–10, p. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krivine, J.-L., Realizability algebras III: some examples. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 28 (2018), no. 1, pp. 4576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Usuba, T., Choiceless Löwenheim-Skolem property and uniform definability of grounds, 2019, arXiv:1904.00895, submitted.Google Scholar

Read the original on cambridge.org ↗