Acar, S., Burnett, C., and Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of creativity: Originality and more. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acar, S., and Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acar, S., and Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Art, Creativity, and Aesthetics, 9, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acar, S., and Runco, M. A. (2017). Latency predicts category switch in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 43–51.10.1037/aca0000091CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children's artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573–578.10.1177/0146167282083027Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In Theories of creativity, edited by Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. S., 61–91. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

An, D., and Runco, M. A. (2016). General and domain-specific contributions to creative ideation and creative performance. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12, 523–532.10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beketayev, K., and Runco, M. A. (2016). Scoring divergent thinking tests with a semantics-based algorithm. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 210–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In Contemporary approaches to creative thinking, edited by Gruber, H. E., Terell, G., and Wertheimer, M., 1–30. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Corraza, G. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267.10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cropley, A. J. (1990). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1961). Creative and academic achievement among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jay, E., and Perkins, D. (1997). Creativity's compass: A review of problem finding. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook, vol. 1 (pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2012). Creativity. 4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338–352.10.1080/10400419.2014.929424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubart, T., Barbot, B., and Zenasni, F. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41–52.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. (1968). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In Toward a psychology of being, 135–145. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Merrotsy, P. (2013). A note on Big C creativity and little c creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 474.10.1080/10400419.2013.843921CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, A. I. (2009). 137: Jung, Pauli, and the pursuit of a scientific obsession. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.10.1037/h0043158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murray, H. A. (1959). Vicissitudes of creativity. In Creativity and its cultivation, edited by Anderson, H. H., 203–221. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., and Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45–53.10.1177/073428299100900104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1976). To understand is to invent. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.Google Scholar

Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In Everyday creativity and new views of human nature, edited by Richards, R., 25–54. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Rogers, C. R. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In Creativity and its cultivation, edited by Anderson, H. H., 69–82. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Rubenson, D. L., and Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children's art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177–189.'="" href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The+creativity+of+children%27s+art&author=Runco+M.+A.&publication+year=1989&journal=Child+Study+Journal&volume=19&pages=177-189">Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1993). Operant theories of insight, originality, and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 59–74.10.1177/0002764293037001006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1994). Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 272–290). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377–390.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.10.1002/cd.23219967203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Education, 47, 317–324.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2007). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 1–9.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2010). Education based on a parsimonious theory of creativity. In Nurturing creativity in the classroom, edited by Beghetto, R. A. and Kaufman, J. C., 235–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781629.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2011). Personal creativity. In Runco, M. A. and Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 220–223). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00169-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Rev. ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2016a). Creative interpretations of educational contradictions. In Beghetto, R. and Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives (pp. 75–87). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2016b). Overview of developmental perspectives on creativity and the realization of potential. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151, 97–109.10.1002/cad.20145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2017). Major works on creativity and education. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (forthcoming). Ideas for a creative 21st Century. In Penagos-Corzo, J. C. (Ed.), 75 ideas in creativity & psychology for the XXI century. Universidad de las Américas Puebla.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Acar, S., and Cayirdag, N. A. (2017). Closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 242–249.10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., Acar, S., Kaufman, J. C., and Halladay, L. R. (2016). Changes in reputation and associations with fame and biographical data. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1, 52–60.10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., Kaufman, J. C., Halladay, L. R., and Cole, J. C. (2010). Change in reputation as index of genius and eminence. Historical Methods, 43, 91–96.10.1080/01615440903270273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., Johnson, D., and Gaynor, J. R. (1999). The judgmental bases of creativity and implications for the study of gifted youth. In Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods, edited by Fishkin, A., Cramond, B., and Olszewski-Kubilius, P., 113–141. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Kim, D. (forthcoming). The four Ps of creativity and recent updates. In Carayannis, E. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., and Cramond, B. (2011). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A 50 year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368.10.1080/10400419.2010.523393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213–221.10.1177/001316449205200126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Pina, J. (2013). Imagination and personal creativity. In Oxford handbook of the development of imagination, edited by Taylor, M., 379–386. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., Turkman, B., Acar, S., and Nural, M. V. (2016). Idea density and the creativity of written works. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2, 26–31.10.18536/jge.2017.04.02.01.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Quality and purpose, quantity and chance. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1995). Exceptional personal influence: An integrative paradigm. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 371–376.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Political pathology and societal creativity. In Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health, edited by Runco, M. A. and Richards, R., 359–377. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 96–107.10.1080/10400419.2012.676974CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Creativity is a decision. In Teaching for intelligence, edited by Costa, A. L., 2:85–106. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Training and Publishing.Google Scholar

Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 31–322.Google Scholar

Tan, C. (2016). Creativity and Confucius. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 79–84.10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.09CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The talent student: A validation of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Weisberg, R. (2015). On the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 111–124.10.1080/10400419.2015.1030320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1975). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar