Weakness ID: 215
Vulnerability Mapping: ALLOWED This CWE ID may be used to map to real-world vulnerabilitiesAbstraction: Base Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
Description
The product inserts sensitive information into debugging code, which could expose this information if the debugging code is not disabled in production.
Extended Description
When debugging, it may be necessary to report detailed information to the programmer. However, if the debugging code is not disabled when the product is operating in a production environment, then this sensitive information may be exposed to attackers.
Common Consequences
This table specifies different individual consequences
associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is
violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an
adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about
how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other
consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be
exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to
achieve a different impact.
| Impact | Details |
|---|---|
|
Read Application Data |
Scope: Confidentiality |
Potential Mitigations
| Phase(s) | Mitigation |
|---|---|
|
Implementation |
Do not leave debug statements that could be executed in the source code. Ensure that all debug information is eradicated before releasing the software. |
|
Architecture and Design |
Strategy: Separation of Privilege Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges. |
Relationships
This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this
weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to
similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition,
relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user
may want to explore.
Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (View-1000)
| Nature | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChildOf |
|
200 | Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor |
| CanFollow |
|
489 | Active Debug Code |
Relevant to the view "Software Development" (View-699)
| Nature | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf |
|
199 | Information Management Errors |
Modes
Of Introduction
The different Modes of Introduction provide information
about how and when this
weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which
introduction
may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the
given
phase.
| Phase | Note |
|---|---|
| Implementation |
Applicable Platforms
This listing shows possible areas for which the given
weakness could appear. These
may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms,
Technologies,
or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given
weakness appears for that instance.
| Languages |
Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined Prevalence) |
Demonstrative Examples
Example 1
The following program changes its behavior based on a debug flag.
(bad code)
Example Language: JSP
<% if (Boolean.getBoolean("debugEnabled")) {
%>
User account number: <%= acctNo %>
<%
} %>
The code writes sensitive debug information to the client browser if the "debugEnabled" flag is set to true .
Selected Observed
Examples
Note: this is a curated list of examples for users to understand the variety of ways in which this weakness can be introduced. It is not a complete list of all CVEs that are related to this CWE entry.
| Reference | Description |
|---|---|
|
Password exposed in debug information. |
|
|
CGI script includes sensitive information in debug messages when an error is triggered. |
|
|
FTP client with debug option enabled shows password to the screen. |
Weakness Ordinalities
| Ordinality | Description |
|---|---|
|
Primary |
(where the weakness exists independent of other weaknesses) |
Detection
Methods
| Method | Details |
|---|---|
|
Automated Static Analysis |
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.) Effectiveness: High |
Memberships
This MemberOf Relationships table shows additional CWE Categories and Views that
reference this weakness as a member. This information is often useful in understanding where a
weakness fits within the context of external information sources.
| Nature | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | 717 | OWASP Top Ten 2007 Category A6 - Information Leakage and Improper Error Handling | |
| MemberOf | 731 | OWASP Top Ten 2004 Category A10 - Insecure Configuration Management | |
| MemberOf | 933 | OWASP Top Ten 2013 Category A5 - Security Misconfiguration | |
| MemberOf | 963 | SFP Secondary Cluster: Exposed Data | |
| MemberOf | 1417 | Comprehensive Categorization: Sensitive Information Exposure | |
| MemberOf | 1445 | OWASP Top Ten 2025 Category A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions |
Vulnerability Mapping Notes
| Usage |
ALLOWED
(this CWE ID may be used to map to real-world vulnerabilities) |
| Reason | Acceptable-Use |
|
Rationale |
This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities. |
|
Comments |
Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction. |
Notes
Relationship
This overlaps other categories.
Taxonomy
Mappings
| Mapped Taxonomy Name | Node ID | Fit | Mapped Node Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLOVER | Infoleak Using Debug Information | ||
| OWASP Top Ten 2007 | A6 | CWE More Specific | Information Leakage and Improper Error Handling |
| OWASP Top Ten 2004 | A10 | CWE More Specific | Insecure Configuration Management |
| Software Fault Patterns | SFP23 | Exposed Data |
Content
History
Submissions |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Date | Submitter | Organization | |
|
2006-07-19
(CWE Draft 3, 2006-07-19) |
PLOVER | ||
Modifications |
|||
| Modification Date | Modifier | Organization | |
|
2025-12-11
(CWE 4.19, 2025-12-11) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities | |||
|
2023-06-29
(CWE 4.12, 2023-06-29) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Mapping_Notes | |||
|
2023-04-27
(CWE 4.11, 2023-04-27) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction | |||
|
2023-01-31
(CWE 4.10, 2023-01-31) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Description | |||
|
2020-12-10
(CWE 4.3, 2020-12-10) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
|
2020-02-24
(CWE 4.0, 2020-02-24) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction, Type | |||
|
2017-11-08
(CWE 3.0, 2017-11-08) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Applicable_Platforms | |||
|
2014-07-30
(CWE 2.8, 2014-07-31) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Demonstrative_Examples, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |||
|
2014-06-23
(CWE 2.7, 2014-06-23) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships | |||
|
2012-10-30
(CWE 2.3, 2012-10-30) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Potential_Mitigations | |||
|
2012-05-11
(CWE 2.2, 2012-05-15) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |||
|
2011-06-01
(CWE 1.13, 2011-06-01) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Common_Consequences, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings | |||
|
2010-09-27
(CWE 1.10, 2010-09-27) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Description, Name, Observed_Examples | |||
|
2009-05-27
(CWE 1.4, 2009-05-27) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Demonstrative_Examples | |||
|
2008-09-08
(CWE 1.0, 2008-09-09) |
CWE Content Team | MITRE | |
| updated Relationships, Relationship_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings | |||
|
2008-08-15
(CWE 1.0, 2008-09-09) |
Veracode | ||
| Suggested OWASP Top Ten 2004 mapping | |||
|
2008-07-01
(CWE 1.0, 2008-09-09) |
Sean Eidemiller | Cigital | |
| added/updated demonstrative examples | |||
|
2008-07-01
(CWE 1.0, 2008-09-09) |
Eric Dalci | Cigital | |
| updated Time_of_Introduction | |||
Previous Entry Names |
|||
| Change Date | Previous Entry Name | ||
| 2020-02-24 | Information Exposure Through Debug Information | ||
| 2010-09-27 | Information Leak Through Debug Information | ||
