The human body is made up of 50-60% of water. It expels on average 2 litres a day, making hydrating with pure water important for long term health and wellbeing. Yet for most people living in the West pure water is a scarce commodity. Governments and local councils have assumed tacit rights to add contaminants to town water supplies, and in some cases rainwater tanks, thereby controlling what comes out of the faucet.
‘I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth…That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup…as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.’ Jesuit Supreme Oath
Alarmingly, the elite class have determined that drinking water is no longer a human right. In 2016 Roman Catholic, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, then Chairman and former CEO of Nestlé stated, ‘water is not a human right.’ His statement supports other dictator organizations such as the United Nations.’
Reading between the lines of Brabeck-Letmathe’s monologue below, it is obvious that by controlling water they can control populations as they have in the past. The Soviets and Nazis added Fluoride to the water in concentration camps to make the inmates compliant; Councils regularly restrict and ration water through by-laws and water charges; cutting off water supplies to an enemy is an ancient tactic. History alone shows that handing over the most important substance that sustains life to a corporation is utter madness.
‘Water, is of course, the most important raw material we have in the world today. It is a question on whether we [the elite] should privatise the normal water supply for the population…One opinion which I think is extreme is declaring water a public right; that means, that as a human being you should have the right to water. AND, the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other [in his opinion like cake, caviar, lollies, grapes, chocolate] and like other foodstuff it should have a market value [“right-to-live-tax”], so that we’re all aware that it has a price. And then, that one should take specific measures for the parts of the population that has no access to this water.’ Peter Brabeck-Letmathe’s, 2005, Nestle Group
Many of Brabeck-Letmathe’s proposals, such as water being classified a food is shared by the Jesuit run Vatican. In Jesuit-Pope Francis 2024 World Food Day address he said, Water is life, water is food. Leave no one behind. Leave no one behind is echoed by all socialist governments around the West. You will keep up with the march to the new Dark Age, even if it is by the barrel of a gun.
Our first Voluntary National Review covers all [UN] 17 SDGs with a national lens that reflects our belief in productive, sustainable and inclusive development to ensure no one is left behind… that puts sustainable intergenerational wellbeing at the centre of policy making and the management of our [water] resources. New Zealand Voluntary National Review, 2019, PM Jacinda Ardern, page 4
There is a silent war being waged again the Protestant West and that war is aimed at destroying Biblical worldviews to reintroduce humanistic pantheistic worldviews. Because politics is downstream of culture, and culture is down stream of religion, the elites of this world have slowly walked through the institution of the church, prising it off its Bible base, without most Christians being aware.
‘Only puny secrets need protection. Big secrets are protected by public incredulity’ Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980), Canadian Philosopher
Christianity has been buffeted for over a hundred years by dialectic tools and atheistic education. First by redefining mankind as human beings, (a description not found in the King James Bible), and secondly by further defining human beings as a resource. The outcome is that God given inalienable rights given to Mankind, no longer apply.
The world view of traditional [pagan sun worshipping] societies tends to be strikingly different from the modern [Protestant Christian] world view. In particular, the values assigned by such societies to biodiversity are grounded on very different premises…the [traditional] people are also closely tied to the natural resources of their immediate environments. They therefore tend to view themselves as members of a community that not only includes other humans, but also plants and animals as well as rocks, springs and pools. People are then members of a community of beings – living and non-living. Their relationships with other community members, be they trees, birds or mountain peaks are moulded by the relationships with other human members of the communities, as recipients of altruistic or mutualistic favours. Thus, rivers may be viewed as mothers…Animals may be treated as kin [Pantheism]…’ UN Biodiversity Assessment Document, 1996, page 838
Because the elite do not recognise that mankind is made in the image of God, and because mankind has handed over control to the elite, they, in line with their gnostic worldview down-graded the status of human beings to that of rocks, rivers and streams. The UN Global biodiversity Assessment states - ‘Thus rivers maybe viewed as mothers’ This shift means humans, rocks and water have equal rights; and this in turn means the pantheistic ruling class give nature, goddess Gaia, first rights when contemplating risk-by-risk assessment.
‘For the elite to be able to have management of the [water] ecosystem, humans would have no more value than a rock.’ Michael Coffman author of Saviors of the Earth?: Politics and Religion of the Environmental Movement
While the shift of mankind’s position from master to slave on the planet quietly took place at the end of the 20th century, draconian socialist leaders were put in place to head fearful Fabian governments in the early 2000s. And those governments weaponised themselves against their people, as was blatantly witnessed during the COVID scam.
‘Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.’ Mao Zedong
The globalist’s agenda for the 21st Century had its blueprint in the 1950s. Within a decade the papal shop front, the United Nations, spearheaded the silent war for renewed world domination. Two World Wars depleted Christian men of the West, leaving a Biblical worldview in the hands of a mourning people. Dialectic swings were put into play successfully gas lighting the West.
‘The Western “worldview is characteristic of large-scale societies heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a world view that is characterised by the denial of the sacred attributes of nature…’ Biodiversity Treaty
Edward Bernays post-war marketing pushed the West into consumerism, and under this insatiable appetite for material possessions, Big Corp was given the nod to pollute the environment with industrial waste from making products consumers never asked for. Through the decade of the 1960s the West was setup to take the blame for pollution, followed by 50 years of earth’s resource shortages, particularly water, propaganda. Words like scarcity, sustainability, greedy West were used in lockstep.
‘Nevertheless, an effective political substitute for war would require “alternate enemies,” some of which might seem equally farfetched in the context of the current war system. It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced…it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. But from present indications it will be a generation to a generation and a half before environmental pollution, however severe, will be sufficiently menacing, on a global scale, to offer a possible basis for a solution.’ Report from Iron Mountain, 1967, The Dial Press, page 51
The United Nations lead the charge with their different support organisations like the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with pantheistic spiritual roots.
‘To promote an alternative model for a sustainable communities and lifestyles, based in ecospiritual practice and principles…’ IUCN purpose International Union for the Conservation of Nature
Vatican Banker Edmond Rothschild and occultist Maurice Strong held Earth summits through the 1970s that culminated in 1992 Earth Summit. At this summit Agenda 21, exoterically promoted to save the planet masking its esoteric goal of enslaving the planet was signed by corrupt governments without the consent of the people.
‘In a biocentric [Eco-spiritual] approach, the rights of nature are defended first and foremost on the grounds of the intrinsic value of animals, plants, rivers, mountains and ecosystems, rather than simply on the basis of their unitarian value or benefits to humans.’ IUCN
The Jesuit led Club of Rome (Papal Rome) published article after article, after document, after book, conducting exclusive meetings to curate the proposal of Report from Iron Mountain; cleverly including that the earth was overpopulated. One such book was Limits to Growth that melded the notion that earth’s “limited” resources was strained by overpopulation. The book warned that the earth would run out of gold, silver, mercury, tin, petroleum, copper and natural gas before the end of the twentieth century – whoops!
‘It is also possible to avoid or extend these limits by technological advances that remove dependence on the land (synthetic food) or that create new sources of fresh water (desalinization of sea water)’ Limits to Growth, 1972, Club of Rome, page 54
Professor John P Holdren, part of Obama’s administration, advocated multinational population restrictions, including mandatory abortion in the US. In his 1977 book Ecoscience, he proposed subtly poisoning the water supply with a sterilant.
‘There are other possible limits…The most obvious one, second in importance only to land, is the availability of fresh water. There is an upper limit to the fresh water runoff from the land areas of the earth each year, and there is also an exponentially increasing demand for that water.’ Limits to Growth, 1972, Club of Rome, page 53
The Club of Rome is an NGO of the United Nations. The club is an intellectual advisory arm that gives eco reports to the UN that shape UN policy frameworks, climate summits, and sustainable development goals on resources as water. The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are put into law at a national level using Rockefeller initiatives bypassing democratic voting. In conjunction, UNESCO education (Jesuit education) brainwashes future generations.
‘As we watch the sun go down, evening after evening, through the smog across the poisoned waters of our native earth, we must ask ourselves seriously whether we really wish some future universal historian on another planet to say about us: “With all their genius and with all their skill, they ran out of foresight and air and food and water and ideas…’ U Thant, third UN Secretary-General (1961-1971)
A wannabe scientist, Paul Erhlich, became a useful idiot, to subdue Western civilisation. He wrote a “B” grade book supporting Limits to Growth, titled The Population Bomb, that the elite duly “puffed up”.
‘The causal chain of the [environmental] deterioration is easily followed to its source. Too many cars, too many factories, too much detergent, too much pesticide, multiplying contrails, inadequate sewage…too little water, too much carbon dioxide—all can be traced easily to too many people.’ The Population Bomb, 1968, Paul Erhlich, page 66-67
By the 1977 Erhlich became even bolder, announcing future plans to a trusting populus, adding sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control…such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals.
Treating water systems with chemicals including Fluoride in Western countries started in the 1950s in the name of sanitization and dental health. However, the ruling class knew very well the effects of the toxin.
‘Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water…’ Nolan Finley, News Columist, Detroit, USA.
Besides infertility problems, Fluoride causes premature aging, higher rates of cancer and an assorted array of medical problems facilitating new markets for Rockefeller Medicine and Big Pharma.
‘The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe ad wear. We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far. We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.’ John D. Rockefeller
The elite like celebrating initiatives that are successful. At the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit a World Water Day was proposed. As the 1992 Summit, World Water Day is yet another day to indulge in pagan sun worshipping rituals.
The UN is the action arm of the Vatican and their agents. In line with the Jesuit oath all blame for any perceived problem is always thrown at the Protestant West - A typical Westerner consumes, directly and through thirsty products like food, about a hundred times their own weight in water every day. That is why some of the great rivers of the world, such as the Nile, Indus, Yellow River and Colorado, no longer reach the sea in any appreciable volume. All their water is taken.
When the UN talks about unsustainability, and SDGs, it is speaking directly to the West. Development is a code word for Dominance – dominance over the West.
‘The world’s growing population and unsustainable consumption patterns are putting increasing stress on air, land, water and energy resources.’ Agenda 21, 1992, Chapter 5
Aurelio Peccei, the founder of the Club of Rome, recapping the Report from Iron Mountain announced, In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.
In the year 2000, The Millennium Declaration, a resolution adopted by the General Assembly, was signed by Western governments without democratic debate -
We, heads of State and Government, have gathered at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 6 to 8 September 2000, at the dawn of a new millennium, to reaffirm our faith in the Organization [One world religion in disguise] and its Charter [dogma, doctrine] as indispensable foundations [one world government] of a more peaceful [dictatorship], prosperous and just world…To stop the unsustainable exploitation of water resources by developing water management strategies at the regional, national and local levels, which promote both equitable access and adequate supplies…’
And the people kept quiet, giving tacit consent, confirming their status as human beings, with the same rights as a rock. Five years after the Millennium Declaration signing, Green Cross International and its partners pressed the UN to assign water higher rights. Rights that would be controlled by the elite, using their own definitions of what “water” is and what constitutes “clean water” over individual rights of man. John D. Rockefeller fraudulently had oil classified as a fossil fuel.
‘Green Cross International and its partners propose to start talks with a view to adopting a Universal Convention on the Right to Water. The ratification of such a convention by the UN Member States would give a legal instrument to all people to defend their right to clean [high toxic chemical loaded] water and sanitation and would oblige governments to ensure its implementation. The convention would help distinguish between the different aspects of water use and the related rights and obligations of different participants in this process at the local, national and international levels.’ M. Gorbachev, Chairman of the Board, Green Cross International Commission on Sustainable Development, 2005
The Green Cross International Commission have not yet gained the upper hand, but UN control of water is secured through a combination of UN resolutions, broader international human rights treaties, and specialized global water management conventions.
In Pope Francis 2024 Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ on Care for our Common Home he mentioned the word “water” 47 times.
He started his letter writing, …Francis of Assisi reminds us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our life and a beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us. “Praise be to you, my Lord [god Osiris], through our Sister, Mother Earth [mediator, goddess Gaia], who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit with coloured flowers and herbs”. Gaia is the mediator between god Osiris and man in pantheistic sun worshipping religions.
Francis continues, This sister [earth] now cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her. We have come to see ourselves as her lords and masters, entitled to plunder her at will…Warming has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious circle which aggravates the situation even more, affecting the availability of essential resources like drinking water…Fresh drinking water is an issue of primary importance, since it is indispensable for human life and for supporting terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Sources of fresh water are necessary for health care, agriculture and industry…Yet access to safe drinkable water is a basic and universal human right, since it is essential to human survival and, as such, is a condition for the exercise of other human rights…’ He is calling for top-down control of water.
Francis’ laudato si action platform explains more clearly the pantheistic heart of Francis words that repeats the UN’s rhetoric –
‘Ecological Spirituality, one of the Laudato Si’ Goals Contemplation is the foundation of Ecological Spirituality. It involves “seeing God in all things” and perceiving the universe as an embodiment of the divine. The term “contemplation” itself stems from the Latin word “templum,” denoting a place inhabited by deities. Indigenous [sun worshipping] communities can help us reconnect with the divine presence that hovered over the waters during creation. Compassion is another vital aspect of Ecological Spirituality. Rooted in the incarnation, this dimension encourages us to cultivate tenderness and remain attentive to both the cries of the Earth and the cries of the marginalized. Care embodies the practical aspect of Ecological Spirituality. It emphasizes our role in tending to creation with the same compassion as God. Ecological Spirituality beckons us to embark on a transformative journey of contemplation, compassion, and care. By recognizing the divine presence in all aspects of creation [pantheism], responding to the cries of the Earth…’ Laudato Si’ Action Platform, Fr. Josh Kureethadam, Jesuit agent invited by Super General of the Jesuit Order to speak at the annual Jesuit Extended Council (Consiglio Allargato)
As governments follow Agenda 21 guidelines (Goals 2,3,6,14) of centralised water delivery infrastructure, the outcome will inevitably be, water restrictions due to only collecting rainwater rather than using self-renewable primary water. To access primary water goddess Gaia would be “scratched”. Primary water can easily be harnessed; however, an abundance of water would mean self-sufficiency and that is not the aim – A one world government and one world religion of total control over a depopulated earth is the goal.
Please share this article with people you know who like this type of exposé

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.