This site does not allow itself to be embedded. You can still read it on the original site — the toolbar below keeps your place in the directory.
Today it happened again. A developer, that we’ll call Mark to avoid exposing his real name, read the Redis 5.0 RC5 change log, and was disappointed to see that Redis still uses the “master” and “slave” terminology in order to identify different roles in Redis replication. I said that I was sorry he was disappointed about that, but at the same time, I don’t believe that terminology out of context…
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.