This is an article version of a thread we did on Twitter/X, which you can find here.
On occasion you will see people pose questions like the following:
Unpopular Opinion: White nationalists will hate brownoids domestically while whining about the ethnic cleansing in Gaza. That’s hypocritical.
The end result is less brown people. So why is Israel cleansing the region a bad thing?
This is common and politically relevant enough that it’s worth extracting the best-faith formulation of this sentiment and looking to some of our books for the answer.
Firstly, let’s turn to You Gentiles, written by prominent Jewish author Maurice Samuel, and republished by us in a newly edited edition with an exclusive foreword by subject matter expert Dr. Kevin MacDonald. In the book, Samuel asks:
Is there any special significance in the distinction I have so long cherished—the distinction of “Jew-Gentile”—not to be found in the class of distinctions implied in “American-Foreigner” or “Englishman-Foreigner”?
While Samuel focuses on intra-European distinctions, we will see that his conclusions are more broadly applicable. His book examines the question from multiple angles, but two are perhaps most relevant here.
Samuel considers Gentiles a people defined spiritually by “sport,” and Jews by “seriousness.” What this means pragmatically is that Jews not only don’t understand, but look down on, a Gentile sense of honor, for example in war.
Murder (except in self-defense) is murder, whether committed in a duel, with all its gentlemanly rules, or in unrestrained rage… We cannot understand a man who, attacking another, insists that the other, in self-defense, shall strike only above the belt.
What this means in practice is chivalry and norms of war are impossible when fighting with Jews, for whom every struggle is existential. This is certainly the way Israel conducts itself – mass-scale collective punishment against civilians, sexually abusing POWs, the use of starvation, and more.
This philosophy of “total war” was finally introduced to Europe most prominently in World War II, and led to the defeat of nationalism and devastation of the continent by pro-Jewish powers.
An even clearer example of the Gentile-Jew divide in You Gentiles is revolutionary cosmopolitanism. Samuel argues that the most liberal, leftist, cosmopolitan, internationalist Gentile can only ever be imitating what the Jew is by nature.
He [the Jew] is the only true socialist and cosmopolitan—but in such a true and tacit sense that he is completely distinguished from all of you…. It is our very cosmopolitanism that gives us our national character. Because we are the only ones who are cosmopolitan by instinct rather than by argument….
He concludes that portion with the infamous words:
We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands.
This brings us to some very practical contemporary issues. There is no comparison between the internationalism of the Jews and the nationalism of the Palestinians – especially if we’re talking specifically about those Palestinians who are literally fighting to remain in Palestine.
If they end up elsewhere, it is directly due to Israel, which is all too happy to ship them off. Indeed, the state of Israel itself is involved in sending migrants into Europe, Samuel’s ancient enemy.
Similarly, in the US, there’s no Palestinian lobby pushing for war on behalf of a foreign nation, or for immigration and other unpopular domestic policies. However, there is most certainly a Jewish one, as any nationalist is well aware.
This issue was mentioned by Hitler as well, as recorded in one of the speeches in our book In His Own Words: The Essential Speeches of Adolf Hitler. Presciently, Hitler said of the possibility of a Jewish state in Palestine:
Thus, the goal of this Zionist state is nothing more than to pull the wool over the eyes of the unsuspecting. … The whole Zionist state will be nothing but an academy for their international schemes, and from there everything will be directed, and every Jew will receive, as it were, an immunity as a citizen…
Finally, we should also mention our book The Sword of Christ, also with a foreword by Dr. MacDonald and now in its third edition with a new preface by the author Giles Corey. That foreword is focused on the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the response from American so-called “Christian” Zionists.
Corey shines an excellent and necessary spotlight on the bloodthirsty nature of the Zionist project, and the tremendous hypocrisy of so-called “Christians” who support it. His book also explores the long history of Jewish hostility to Gentile civilization, going back to medieval Europe and to their modern role in promoting anti-social and degenerate policies in the West today.
The book also features a long and thorough section exposing the history of “Christian” Zionism, which we have summarized in another article.
In conclusion, why are White nationalists focused on Israel and not Hamas?
In short, it’s because we are WHITE nationalists, and so both focused on our own racial interests, and aligned with the White race’s intrinsic character and virtues.
Israel is not Western, it is a Jewish state, and the Jews have a several thousand year history of antagonism toward European Gentiles, by their own admission
Israel today is, as Hitler predicted, the hub of Jewish internationalism, which is of infinitely greater relevance to those seeking sovereign nationalism in Western nations than Palestinian nationalism
Many White nationalists are rightfully put off by the unique barbarism displayed by the Jewish state, which is in line with Samuel’s diagnosis of the Jewish character and which matches far better with bronze age savagery than the civilizational and moral achievements of Europeans
Similarly, to see a people fight with courage and distinction against overwhelming odds in defense of their homeland stirs something in many of us, even if they are not our people, and we do not wish to be domestic neighbors
Lastly, if we ARE going to throw away any attempt at justifying nationalism on moral grounds and put up a pretense of total disregard for human life – why aim that at the Palestinians, and not their enemies? Whose interests does that serve?
The account we originally responded to called himself a “Christian colonizer” – what version of Christianity is this that calls for Israel to ethnically cleanse its enemies with their “mass death,” and implies that we can finish off any of Israel's enemies who escape?
All things considered, the original question could only presuppose a historic and racial unity between European Gentiles and Jews – which, as we have briefly shown here, could not possibly be further from the truth.
Three of the books we referred to in this thread can be found on our website - check them out for more information!
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.