The folks at the CDC have been scratching their collective heads over autism for decades. They still can’t figure out if more kids actually have autism.
According to officials, every increase is always greater awareness, better diagnosing.
One in 31, one in 19 boys
I’m quite sure that when the new numbers come out next April, we’ll be getting closer to Australia’s rate of one in 23 children or Ireland’s one in 20 or Northern Ireland’s one in 16. Whatever the new numbers, autism still won’t be a crisis. (No US health official has ever used the word crisis when talking about autism.)
According to the CDC, autism is a curious condition that seems to, but never really does, affect more and more children.
It’s a puzzle all right. This developmental disorder has no known cause, prevention or cure and is sure to remains a mystery forever unless someone decides to tell the truth.
For some reason we keep going to the people who run the vaccine program and who are awash in Pharma dollars to ask them if their vaccines cause autism. They never run out of population studies showing NO LINK.
Regressive autism affects at least a third of autistic children. These are kids who start out normally developing and then gradually or suddenly lose learned skills and end up on the spectrum.
FOR YEARS parents have asked our health officials to study these children to determine what environmental triggers might have preceded their regression.
No one in public health has had time for this research and elected officials have not called for it, but fortunately, there is a new study just out by Steve Kirsch.
Data from a large autism clinic show 40% of sudden regression autism happened within 2 days after vaccination
And 76% of the cases happened within 2 weeks! In 98% of the rapid regression cases, the common element that parents noted just prior to the onset of sudden regression was routine vaccination.
Congress will not investigate because they will lean on large studies which use methods designed specifically not to find a signal to claim vaccines don’t cause autism. But those studies only prove that bad studies can fail to find a signal if they use the wrong methods.
Documented evidence
The most sensitive method is simply to make a histogram of the time between a child’s most recent vaccine and the onset of rapid regressive autism. . . .
You can do this in any autism practice anywhere in the world retrospectively. It is simple. NOBODY HAS DONE THIS. I wonder why?
It took a long time, but I finally located a large autism treatment clinic who was willing to share the statistical information that they had gathered from the parents of autistic kids in the clinic that I wrote about in an earlier Substack article.
This is new. This has never been revealed to the world before. Nobody would dare do that.
The clinic examined 182 patient records.
84 were “rapid onset autism” cases (46%).
Of those cases, a “routine vaccination” was mentioned as happening before the event in 98% of those cases.
In 40% of the cases, the regression happened within 2 days after routine vaccination.
In 76% of the cases, the regression happened within 2 weeks after routine vaccination.
These numbers cannot happen by chance.
The only explanation is vaccines cause autism. Adding acetaminophen post-vaccine makes the autism outcome more likely.
Dr. Ken Stoller just made this video to explain Kirsch’s research.
The Autism Pattern No One Will Touch
Video: 3:03
Dr. Stoller:
This is the most honest medical data I have ever seen on autism.
Steve Kirsch just dropped a private follow-up survey of parents whose kids experienced rapid regression autism.
He asked more detailed questions. The pattern that came back is not subtle.
Here’s what the data shows.
In kids who regressed rapidly, the sequence is consistent with vaccination, then a severe reaction, then Tylenol in most cases, then severe, permanent autism. \
This is not autism randomly appearing around the same time as vaccines.
This is a documented series of events happening immediately after vaccination.
Look at the timing column.
There’s a tight cluster of children whose regression began within 12 to 24 hours of the shot. That is not calendar coincidence.
That is a biological reaction to an acute insult.
Look at the symptoms right before the regression: fever, cried all night, encephalitis, seizures, anaphylaxis.
You’re not just seeing a diagnosis appear. You’re watching the process of neuroinflammation happen in real time.
Kirsch has three kids, none autistic, zero vaccine reactions of any kind ever.
That’s the control group.
The human immune system is capable of handling these vaccines without a catastrophic, brain-altering inflammatory cascade.
The children in this survey were pushed over the edge.
The number of mainstream autism researchers willing to comment on this data, ZERO.
The NIH should be all over this. They’re not.
The mainstream narrative still claims autism is just a neurodevelopmental difference some kids are born with.
This data shows that for a clear, identifiable subgroup, autism is a sequela—an injury that follows a specific, identifiable, and preventable event.
They will call it recall bias. They will say parents just want an explanation.
But these parents are documenting clinical events:
encephalitis, seizures, anaphylaxis. Those are not parental interpretations. Those are medical injuries.When the injury precedes the loss of skills, the sequence is established. .
Every row in that spreadsheet is the same story: A child on a normal developmental trajectory. A medical intervention. An acute inflammatory or neurological event. Then the permanent loss of skills.
This is not association. This is a documented clinical sequence.
Alter Ai called it exactly that, devastatingly clear.
Nobody wants to collect this data. Nobody wants to look at it.
We now know exactly what data to collect, and it tells a stunningly consistent story.
Vaccines are triggering autism in susceptible kids, and Tylenol is like pouring gasoline on the fire.
We know the questions. We know how to collect this prospectively in under 30 days.
All it takes is one honest researcher willing to risk their career to tell the truth.
Someone like Marcus Zervos was willing to be on the COVID side.
Is there a Marcus Zervos for autism anywhere in the world because the data is already here. It’s clear. And it’s not going away.
The children in this study were the kids who were dramatically affected by vaccinations. What about the ones who eventually suffered the same fate, only it was a more subtle, gradual loss of skills?
These are the children who stopped making eye contact, who weren’t potty trained any longer, who lost the words they had learned to say, and who started hand flapping and stimming.
Dr. Erica Schwartz was just confirmed as head of the CDC. Will she look into this? Does anyone at the CDC really care about autism? Are they too afraid to look at the science that implicates their highly profitable vaccine program?
As this CNN article shows, Schwartz’s Senate confirmation was tied to her support for the vaccine program.
Maybe what Anthony Fauci did to cover up the truth about COVID is really standard practice by US health officials. How much has been lied about and covered up when it comes to autism?
Please comment, share, restack, subscribe (it’s free and it helps spread the word)
Leave a comment
“The two most misguided notions held in America: Our government wouldn’t really do that to us; if they did, they would tell us about it on TV.”
--Anonymous
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.