Reading · AllThatHistory Weekly

This page did not load. You can still read it on the original site — the toolbar below keeps your place in the directory.

The Library of Alexandria did not burn in one catastrophic fire. Caesar probably destroyed a warehouse, not the library. The Arab general who supposedly burned it centuries later is almost certainly a fabrication. What actually happened a slow institutional decline across 300 years is less dramatic but more disturbing. Most ancient knowledge was not destroyed. It was simply never copied again.

Library of Alexandria - Wikipedia — *Ancient Library of Alexandria, depicting scholars studying manuscripts and preserving knowledge within one of history’s most celebrated centers of learning.*

The Library of Alexandria is one of the most durable myths in the history of knowledge. In the standard version, a vast repository of ancient wisdom containing hundreds of thousands of scrolls, the accumulated intellectual output of the ancient world was destroyed in a catastrophic fire, and the knowledge was lost forever. This burning is usually attributed to Julius Caesar, or alternatively to the Arab conquest of Egypt in 641 CE, depending on which version of the story you encountered first.

Both of these attributions are, in important ways, wrong. The Library of Alexandria did not burn in a single catastrophic fire. It did not contain all the knowledge of the ancient world. And whatever was lost in Alexandria was not the primary reason we lack access to most ancient literature today.

But the true story which involves the slow dismantling of an institution over several centuries, a series of partial losses, and a fundamental misunderstanding of how ancient knowledge was stored and transmitted is both more complicated and more interesting than the myth. And it has real implications for how we think about what was actually lost.

The Lost Library of Alexandria: Did It Actually Burn, or Was That a Myth?

Comments