RSS Amplifier

Aj Saxsma · Aug 17, 2026

For When Group Dialogue Scenes Feel Like One Person Wearing Different Masks

0
Sign in to vote or save

Aj Saxsma · Aj Saxsma

Dearest writer, you are passing out lines in your group scenes because you want to make sure every character gets some face time.

You might be stressed about it, you probably feel like you’re showing your hand.

Then you finish the scene and it very much feels that way, that you made up lines just to have a character have a turn, and you go back to the dialogue and redistribute the lines and try again and it still feels ick.

I want to help you feel confident about those types of scenes.

I want to reframe this with you, because it takes off all the pressure: presence in a scene is not about who gets a line.

It is about who has a distinct psychological lens through which they are experiencing the moment. Sit with that for a second.

When every character in the room gets a line shoved on them to say or is running the same general human response to what just happened, when they are all surprised or all grieving or all tense in the same register, the scene will feel like one personality wearing different masks no matter how different you make the dialogue.

The problem is not the lines, the problem is what you gave your characters before they walked into that room.

Let me show you a quick example.

I want you to imagine your entire cast works at the same company and, unfortunately, they have just watched a mass layoff take place.

Now your cast are all in the breakroom together.

The manager clawed his way up from entry level, he has been in this industry for twenty years and he has watched people who worked hard make it and people who didn’t fall away. His belief, the operating logic he has been running his entire career, is that hard work is what separates the people who survive from the people who don’t. The mass layoffs were a business decision. The right people were kept. This was necessary, he says, this was good for the company.

The veteran employee has been at this company for twenty years and has survived five rounds of layoffs. He has watched people who deserved to stay get cut and people who didn’t deserve to stay get promoted and he has long since stopped trying to find the logic in any of it. His belief is that the world is fundamentally unfair and there is nothing you can do about it. You just keep showing up. He is pouring coffee. He is not saying a word. To him, this is just another sad day.

The office coordinator spent the morning helping walk out people who got cut. She sat with them while they packed their things. She made sure they had water. She believes every person is worthy of dignity and safety and she has just watched twenty people lose both in the span of a morning. She is crying quietly in the corner and not listening to what anyone else is saying.

And then there is the one who just got cut himself. He believed the same thing as the manager, that hard work protects you, that if you show up and do the work and give the company what it needs the company will take care of you. He built his entire professional life around that belief. He is collecting his things from the fridge. He is not sad. He is violently quiet, and he is staring at the manager.

Just staring.

That is the same room.

Same moment.

Four completely different worlds.

Not one of those reactions required a single invented or forced line of dialogue. The belief each character holds handed each reaction to the writer before the scene even started (because not everyone reacts with dialogue; more on that in a second).

The manager’s belief told him this was correct. The veteran’s belief told him this was inevitable. The coordinator’s belief told her this was a human crisis. The cut employee’s belief told him he is looking at the man whose thoughts about the world just destroyed his.

That is voice. Not verbal tics. Not forced speech patterns. Not a character who says y’all and another who uses em dashes.

We are harnessing the unique psychological lens that shapes how a character experiences their world.

This is very important because: We do not all interpret events the same way because we do not all believe the same things about how the world works, because we did not all grow up the same and have the same experiences.

This is what changes when you build your characters from belief before you write a single group scene.

What does this character believe and what does this moment mean to someone running that belief? If you have to ask yourself this question a dozen times, or a hundred times when working in a scene, that diligence is going to pay off by giving you a stellar f**king scene.

No two characters with different beliefs will experience the same moment identically. One sees threat. One sees opportunity. One sees humiliation. One sees nothing worth reacting to at all.

And, like I mentioned earlier, for some characters the reaction is not dialogue. It is action. It is silence. It is emotion. It is the thing they do with their hands or their body or their attention while everyone else is talking.

If a character never says one word in a group scene, that’s not an emergency to fix. Remember? You are not distributing lines anymore. You are not managing presence or making sure everyone gets face time. You are just watching a room full of people with different operating systems encounter the same moment.

The revision worth running on your own group scenes is this:

Pick one moment that every character in the scene experiences simultaneously.

Then remove every line of dialogue and ask what does each character do. Where does their attention go. What do they reach for. What do they ignore. What do they need to believe about what just happened in order to keep functioning.

If the answers are all variations of the same general human response, or what YOU would do, you do not yet know what your characters believe deeply enough to let them inform the character.

That is the work to do before you go back to the dialogue.

Dialogue that sits on top of a distinct belief sounds like a specific type of person. Dialogue that sits on top of nothing sounds like everyone else.

If you found this helpful, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Once a week I release one paid article and if you want access to that, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help support the work and craft I teach here!

best

AJ

No posts

Read the original on ajsaxsma.substack.com

Comments

Nothing yet. Say the first thing.

    Sign in to join the conversation.