Darkness Descends On Britain

Last October, I analyzed the situation in Britain, concluding, at the time:

Until anything more happens in the UK, until the shooting kicks off and stuff starts blowing up, this is probably the last time I have this much to say about the situation in our national ancestral homeland. Part of me hopes I won’t have to say much, because it means nothing ever happens, which is actually better than the alternative, believe it or not. Most of the time, anyway. There’s a lot more I could’ve covered here, but the main thrust of my argument was to make a case for why Britain isn’t headed for civil war in the next five years.

I stand by what I said at the time, because things had seemingly come to a standstill Recent events seem to be proving that history is when nothing ever happens, then everything happens all at once:

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼@DrewPavlou

Just in the past 24 hours: - Sudanese guy attempted to behead someone on the streets of Belfast - Mass stabbing at school in Manchester - Court hears that four Afghan migrants raped a 17 year old girl in Bristol

The Mercian @TheMercianNews

🚨 JUST IN: A 17-year-old girl was raped by four Afghan migrants, including 16-year-old boy, for hours in Bristol. https://t.co/5wQZsC1Oo4

10:30 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 985K Views

389 Replies · 4.73K Reposts · 29K Likes

Now we have a horrific attempted murder at the hands of a Sudanese immigrant in Northern Ireland. Words cannot describe the brutality of the crime committed by this savage and other savages from the Third World:

CBS News@CBSNews

Police in Northern Ireland say they have arrested a Sudanese man in his 30s for a brutal stabbing attack in Belfast late Monday night. Graphic video of the incident shows a man straddling another man lying in a street and slashing him several times in the head and neck with a

9:45 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 535K Views

645 Replies · 681 Reposts · 2.23K Likes

Perhaps that this incident came just days after the full scope of the Henry Nowak murder came to light explains why the attempted beheading of 44-year-old Stephen Ogilvie had such an explosive public reaction. It resulted in rioting in Belfast, along with similar demonstrations throughout the rest of Britain.

Northern Ireland is no stranger to civil unrest, of course. Images of the rioting were reminiscent of the darkest days of The Troubles:

Remix News & Views@RMXnews

Several vehicles and properties have been torched across the city.

9:30 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 3.14K Views

2 Replies · 6 Reposts · 62 Likes

All the way to including checkpoints:

Narodowy@NarodowySklep14

Armed Irish men have set up anti-migrant checkpoints and are searching cars. Source: Memoria Natio / Telegram

8:11 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 1.84M Views

589 Replies · 2.7K Reposts · 22.5K Likes

The rioting is threatening to shift the narrative on the situation in Britain from a long overdue discussion on immigration and multiculturalism to the overblown threat posed by the “far-right.” Unfortunately, there may also be no other way to bring attention to these issues. In addition to it coming on the heels of the Henry Nowak controversy, the sheer brutality of the stabbing in Belfast cannot be exaggerated.

Here’s the full-length video of the incident. The way I see it, anyone who watched the video of George Floyd’s death in police custody should have no issues watching this:

Remix News & Views@RMXnews

An African migrant attempted to behead a man in the middle of the street in Belfast, Northern Ireland, this evening. The graphic footage shows several locals rushing in to intervene and save the man’s life. Police say they attended a “stabbing incident.” They confirmed the

2:14 AM · Jun 9, 2026 · 20K Views

57 Replies · 133 Reposts · 366 Likes

It’s not just the brutality of the crime. The identity of the criminal matters, too, and it has nothing to do with racism:

Melissa Chen@MsMelChen

Every beheading on Western soil is a provocative act of raw subjugation and thus, a declaration of war. To sever a head is a kind of psychological conquest, a deliberate humiliation designed to break the spirit of the host population, broadcast supremacy, and signal that the

6:25 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 89.8K Views

92 Replies · 1.03K Reposts · 5.04K Likes

The Left, of course, is accusing the right of racism, saying that we’re concerned only about crime when at the hands of a non-White person, foreigner, or immigrant. This is, of course, not true. It’s actually the Left that’s in no way concerned about crime until it can be used to blunt away right-wing arguments on topics such as immigration.

More importantly, that so many crimes are committed by migrants represents an unfathomable level of state failure. People who have literally no business being in the country, people to whom neither British state nor society harbors any special obligation towards - i.e., the literal definition of citizenship - are being allowed to enter the country just because. In doing so, a country already facing insurmountable crisis is having its problems multiplied unnecessarily.

Make no mistake: this is a policy failure:

The Sudanese asylum seeker charged in connection with the attempted beheading in Belfast on Monday was granted refugee status in Britain through a fast-track Home Office process that avoided a full face-to-face interview.

The Daily Mail reported on Thursday that the 30-year-old suspect, identified as Hadi Alodid, was allowed to remain in the U.K. after completing a 10-page questionnaire under the Streamlined Asylum Process, a system introduced under the then-Conservative government to help clear tens of thousands of unresolved asylum cases.

Alodid’s case was reportedly handled under the scheme, which was set up as ministers sought to reduce a backlog of 92,000 claims. The process was overseen by then-home secretary Suella Braverman and then-immigration minister Robert Jenrick, both of whom have since joined Reform UK, the party topping national polling in Britain.

According to the tabloid newspaper, the fast-track programme was known inside parts of the Home Office as the “grant 0factory,” allowing applicants from countries with very high asylum grant rates to have their claims processed without the usual in-person interview.

It initially applied to selected nationalities and was later extended to Sudanese applicants in June 2023. Alodid had travelled from Dublin to Belfast by bus in February of that year and was granted a five-year refugee visa in September 2023.

Think about it - why’s a country with so many problems to begin with admitting so many migrants and refugees? None of it makes any sense. Furthermore, why are demands for even the most mild of limits and restrictions on immigration met with such ferocious resistance? Then there’s the rhetoric surrounding immigrants, fashioning them as the literal lifeblood of Britain, as though the country would be absolutely nothing without them, as though they need immigrants when in fact the immigrants need Britain. That sort of talk is abusive and certain to breed resentment.

Britons, Westerners in general, are being bullied into caring less about themselves and more about foreigners. But literally nobody does it. Even liberals do so only in a performative manner. Immigrants are worried only about themselves and are coming to Britain and elsewhere throughout the West for their own benefit, not for the countries they migrate too. If a country decides immigration isn’t working for them, they don’t need to bring any more in. End story.

The fact a crisis-ridden country with widespread discontent is good for nobody, including immigrants, seems to be lost on not only political leadership, but for the citizenry as well. This is a problem of unimaginable proportions, ultimately coming down to the fact there exists an unbridgeable ideological divide. Such a divide cannot be overcome through the political process. It can only be erased by war.

Do recent events vindicate Dr. David Betz and others who say civil war is coming to Britain? It’s a topic I’ve covered extensively as well. The last time I broached the topic, I said that Britain was most certainly headed for a period of heightened unrest and violence, but I didn’t think a major civil war would occur. I still stand by that assessment. I don’t think the situation has changed all that remarkably and I also don’t think the British state is facing a true legitimacy crisis.

At the same time, even optimists need to face the reality that Britain isn’t a peaceful place and will become less so in the years to come. It’s easy to forget now, but during The Troubles, the entire country was affected by violence, not just Northern Ireland. Anyone who wanted to visit Britain had to be aware of the risk of terrorism. I don’t know if the country is headed back to the days of sectarian murders, shootings, and bombings. I don’t think it is. But there are other forms of violence.

Something I think keeps a cap on violence is that Britain has already become a balkanized society. Muslims, in particular, live in their own ethnic communities. In Northern Ireland, there were and still remain Catholic and Protestant neighborhoods. But they were right next door to each other

First and foremost, don’t expect the rioters in Northern Ireland or elsewhere turn into an insurgency akin to the Ulster Volunteer Force of The Troubles or anything like that. In a series of in-depth analytical articles on a future British civil war, a writer going by the name “El Inglés” explained how it’s unlikely that British nationalist faction - referred to as “Pitchfork” - aren’t likely to pose an organized strategic threat:

This section, long and complex though it is, is dedicated to establishing one single point of overwhelming importance — that Pitchfork will not, indeed cannot, cohere into a single organisation that could have a political agenda put forward by a single, coherent political wing. This is a crucial asymmetry between the Troubles and OMT — once OMT start, there will never emerge any single political interlocutor with Crown whom might, in principle, negotiate. Negotiation may take place between Pitchfork and Crown, but it will be local, piecemeal, and non-binding on Pitchfork more generally. There will never be a Pitchfork political party. Individual Pitchfork elements or organisations might issue statements of whatever sort on TikTok or social media, but they will communicate overwhelmingly through action, and only on their own behalf. Pitchfork, taken as a whole, will be mute — savage and implacable, but mute.

There are two major implications here, one good, one bad, depending on your perspective. The good news is that this is hardly any kind of revolutionary force and their ability to threaten the status quo is quite limited. The bad news is that the inability to negotiate with them also means it’s difficult to hold any leverage over them and they can keep the violence going indefinitely.

Liken them to blacks, specifically in the United States. As a demographic, they have disturbingly high crime rates and people from all races are victimized by this one group more than by any other. However, not only are they a minority group at 13 percent of the population, they also lack the ability to organize as a group despite strong in-group identity, and thus are unable to wage strategic violence, the kind which would absolutely pose a major national security threat. In that sense, the so-called far-right, Pitchfork, whatever term you’d like to label them with, pose a less formidable threat than Islamic extremists.

That said, every regime needs an enemy, so expect the British state to play up the threat posed by Pitchfork, outlets like the BBC will turn into even bigger propaganda machines than they already are, and Pitchfork will unfortunately provide fodder for it. What we’re looking at then is less than a civil war and more of a long-term low-intensity conflict, one which the state will simultaneously deny - armed conflict is generally bad for business - and exploit for political purposes. In a sick, twisted way, there’s much for the British government to gain from all this.

Something else to consider is that any future domestic conflict in Britain or anywhere else in Europe will be literally “civil” in that it won’t pit ethnic groups, races, religions against each other as conventional wisdom holds:

Talmud Enjoyer 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 🧬@jewndahalfmen

When people talk about « civil war » in a European country like Britain or France, they seem to be imagining some kind of ethnosectarian race war between the native white population and migrant ethnic militias. If we do have something resembling a civil war (I still don’t think

7:09 PM · Jun 11, 2026 · 14.4K Views

21 Replies · 5 Reposts · 123 Likes

Given that White Britons themselves are a deeply divided demographic while still comprising the majority of the country, the reality is that the conflict will be fought between Whites more than between any other group. Certainly, non-Whites will benefit from this, since they’ll have to risk virtually nothing, all while enjoying government protection and the benefits of living in the First World. This is, ultimately, an ideological conflict.

A certain level of balkanization will occur, but this will in many ways be a convenient way for the British government to contain the chronic unrest and further marginalize communities opposed to the multicultural regime. In turn, separated communities means it’s easier to protect on-side communities.

Mike Jones@technopopulist

I’m afraid I have some bad news for you. If you think civil war in Britain will involve random burning vehicles and rocks being thrown at police, think again. A civil war will involve literal no-go zones like the favelas in Brazil. It will involve rampant paramilitary activity

GB Politics @GBPolitcs

🚨BREAKING: A bus and several other vehicles have been set on fire in Belfast during a protest over last night’s attempted beheading

8:03 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 425K Views

202 Replies · 161 Reposts · 3.54K Likes

The battle lines are being drawn as we speak. Make no mistake: the British regime has picked a side:

Right Angle News Network@Rightanglenews

UK police are now lashing out against indigenous British people, with videos showing officers assaulting already-detained British men and manhandling five-year-old children in ways they never treat foreigners.

12:45 PM · Jun 14, 2026 · 1.14M Views

1.81K Replies · 14.7K Reposts · 48K Likes

In a civil war, the faction which the government, military, and police side with usually emerges the victorious side. Make of that what you will.

The British government’s long-awaited report on the ugly rape gang scandal has arrived. It’s not pretty. I’m not going to get too deep into the weeds on this one, but I did want to share this passage from it [bold mine]:

The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.1 The true number is probably higher. The perpetrators bear primary responsibility, yet the institutional failures that enabled them for decades must also be confronted. In court records and official inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation (‘CSE’) cases bore distinctively Muslim names.2 The vast majority of men involved in these gangs were not convicted. Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%.3 This figure far exceeds the Muslim share of the overall United Kingdom population. The overwhelming majority of the rape gang networks consisted entirely of men from Muslim backgrounds - predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.

In the face of such horror, every Briton must ask themselves: is racism really the problem here? Is how we feel about the perpetrators really more important than the crimes and perpetrators themselves?

Unfortunately, we have an answer to the question:

Face it - that 17 percent of the British public think Muslims pose a threat to the UK isn’t the problem here. It’s not any kind of problem. The bigger problem is that over half of Britons still believe Muslims are as British as anyone else, that they’re a part of society just as anyone else. This is a ridiculous thing to believe in the face of the facts, and will become even more so as the implications of The Rape Gang Inquiry Report sink in. Something has to give, right?

Cognitive dissonance is a real thing. People will find a way to live with contending views that don’t align. In practice, that means one set of views prevails over the other. No matter how damning The Rape Gang Inquiry Report may be, avoiding racism, finding a way, any way, to make multiculturalism work, is still what’s most important in the minds of Britons. Unless they find some new values, nothing can change.

As a result, there’s zero incentive for British leaders, let alone any Western leaders, to pivot away from the anti-racist, civil rights, pro-immigration framework. Politics is downstream of culture and culture is still very much in favor of policies which have brought us to the brink. I expect changes made on the margins for the sake of de-escalating tensions, but nothing longstanding, no major reversal of policy.

It seems, instead, that the sun has finally set on Britain, and a long night awaits a once-great civilization that appears to be dying a slow, torturous death.

What do you think? What’s your reaction to the attempting beheading in Belfast? What’s your reaction to recent events in Britain? Is the country headed for a disastrous crack-up of some kind? Or will Britons simply keep on and carry on, and if so, to where? Let’s discuss it in the comments.

Max Remington writes about armed conflict and prepping. Follow him on Twitter at @AgentMax90.

If you liked this post from We're Not At the End, But You Can See It From Here, why not share? If you’re a first-time visitor, please consider subscribing!