Gaza is being bombed...again.
They are murdering en masse ordinary Palestinians…again.
Most of the victims funnelled into deliberately deprived hospitals and bombed tented facilities are reportedly women and children…AGAIN.
The “they” doing the murdering and murdering and murdering is the group colonising project called western colonialism.
Western is a pseudonym for the racialised label “white” rather than the cardinal direction (there goes the argument that not-white people are the ones obsessed with "race") and “white” is a colonial identity of unreasonable entitlement to someone else's land.
White as an identity only exists because of the group’s project of colonialism across the globe, very much alive and well and which is sometimes referred to as modern capitalism. And this time, in places like West Asia, the colonialism continues without the mainstream mask of civilised democracy painted on it's face.
It strips away the neo-colonial trappings and emerges as a visible force of:
purge,
decimate,
fund, fund, fund,
land grab.
And it does this without neo-colonialism’s theatre of one-sided rules of war, selective international human rights and “values-based” sanctioning.
“Israel has always treated aid as a mathematical equation, not a matter of humanity.
They calculate the bare minimum we need to survive, then give us just enough to keep us from dropping dead. What little food enters Gaza is gone in days.
There is no “stockpile,” no “warehouses overflowing with goods” those are lies.
The truth?
There isn’t a single merchant with 100 sacks of flour.
There isn’t a single store with 100 boxes of dates.
Everything that reaches Gaza vanishes within a week—if not sooner.
And why?
Because they bombed every food storage facility in Gaza. Because they destroyed every factory that packaged food. Because they want us to suffer.
For days now, the Zananas Israeli reconnaissance drones have been screaming through our skies, flying so low their noise drowns out conversations, drowns out the call to prayer, drowns out even the sound of our own thoughts.”—There is no ceasefire only deception. There is no peace only more death. All I ever wanted from this life was something so simple, so ordinary, Mohammed Mohisen, resident of Gaza writing about the so-called ceasefire conditions of 2025 that were deliberately not complied with in March 2025.
Why do away with neo-colonial window dressing, you may ask?
Because that is what the right wing is, an unmasked coloniser, freeing itself of the pretence of liberal colonial values like wanting to make the world a better place, replacing it with the more truthful values of brainwash, kill, control, hurt, squeeze and crush.
“What is much less remarked upon is the extraordinary level, a version of Holocaust denial in western countries.
The fact that there’s this long past of imperialism, slavery, of enormous violence inflicted on many different parts of the world, many different populations across the world…
The violence suffered by the Jewish population of Europe is something in a way prefigured in acts of monstrous violence committed against Asians and Africans,” Pankaj Mishra, author of The World After Gaza, talking to US journalist Chris Hedges.
So let’s not place the buck solely at the feet of US President Donald Trump when the buck was always actually a baton that has been passed down and around the Bilderberg Group table for decades.
“…Yemen was bombarded daily by British-made bombs - including internationally banned cluster munitions - dropped by British-made planes, flown by British-trained pilots. Once their destructive sorties were complete, these jets flew back to Riyadh to be repaired and serviced by British contractors, including Royal Air Force engineers. Chief among those contractors was BAE systems. Independent investigations calculated at least 6,200 employees of the company were posted to Saudi Arabia for the purpose. Receipts for this assistance ran into billions…
In a sick twist, while London was hard at work bombing and starving Yemenis to death, leaked documents indicate British intelligence was concurrently engaged in clandestine, multi-channel psychological warfare operations to compel those same civilians to reject AnsarAllah’s rule, and embrace a UN-endorsed, US-encouraged ‘peace deal’ drawn up by Saudi Arabia.
Under its non-negotiable terms, the popular Resistance movement would be forced to surrender and disarm, in return for the coalition’s military actions to cease and its crippling economic blockade of Sanaa being partially lifted.
The propaganda war was secretly conducted by ARK, a major British intelligence cut-out led by an MI6 journeyman. Working via local NGOs and media organisations that ‘support UK objectives’ to ‘communicate effectively with Yemeni citizens’, ARK conceived the creation of a range of ‘visually rich’ content promoting Riyadh’s derisory ‘peace’ plan. This was disseminated both on- and offline…
Online, ARK covertly managed a Facebook page called “Bab”, with tens of thousands of followers - all of whom were unaware the platform was in reality a British intelligence asset…
The purpose was to ‘collectively be as ‘loud’ as partisan national political and military actors’…
Publicly, many of these propaganda products appeared to be the work of Tadafur - Arabic for ‘work collectively and unite’ - an astro-turf network of ‘well-known’ and ‘respected and influential’ local NGOs and journalists, constructed by ARK…
Sinisterly, multiple passages in the leaked files refer to the urgent need to ensure there was no discernible connection between these propaganda initiatives and the Saudi ‘peace’ plan.
One passage refers to how campaign ‘themes and activities’ would never ‘directly promote the UN or the formal peace process.’ Another states concealing the operation’s agenda behind ostensibly independent civil society voices ‘minimizes the risk’ that ‘outputs are perceived as institutional communications stemming from or directly promoting the UN.’”—Exposing Britain's Covert War On Yemen, Kit Klarenberg, 19 Mar 2025, Global Delinquents
What we are seeing is imperialism choosing not to run around hiding behind what is deemed legal or moral for its goals to be accomplished.
This is what Mr Trump’s government is exposing and espousing. This is what right-wing supporters are saying the world can shift toward. Less expensive pretence and outright, direct and brutal colonialism.
Nothing new but a nostalgic, unvarnished claim to good ol’ “Kill ’em all, and let God sort ’em out”.
“Churchill has been quoted as blaming the famine on the fact Indians were ‘breeding like rabbits’,”—Churchill's policies contributed to 1943 Bengal famine – study, Michael Safi, 20 Mar 2019, theguardian.com
The claim that colonialism can be civilised as opposed to uncivilised, that colonisers are misunderstood gentiles of civilised values, which values are buried within their unreasonable entitlement to someone else’s land is an absurd claim from people who have never understood the words, “No, stop that and grow your own rice on your own land”.
Little Johnny chooses (and it is a choice) to be a bad kid doing bad things and no one thinks that his bullying, taking and unreasonable entitlements earn him a talking to, a push toward actual rectification of harm and some time facing the corner.
What we are witnessing is the hell that awaits us all in the after life. What we have allowed is what is coming for us all.
We are going to burn for infinity in the pits of hell for this horror. And it is a horror for anyone who is still connected to their soul.
Because while we aw and ooh over the new round of inhumanity poured onto District 13 of the world’s Hunger Games District hit list, this is not new or limited to Palestine.
None of this is new…
It is 2025.
We are living in 2025.
And Palestinians in the West Bank, Jenin, Rafah, Gaza (and for almost a century) are experiencing this architected group project of annihilation and land grabbing, while no one beside Yemen actually does anything of significance to stop it.
So do you really expect all of us Africans (from the resource rich jungle) to focus solely on China and the threat, if any, to this “values-based” order?
“It's often called the forgotten conflict, but the civil war that has torn Sudan apart for 19 months is fuelling the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. In just over a year and a half, 13 million people have been displaced from their homes…
A new report by Amnesty International alleges the RSF is using weapons supplied by the U.S.-allied United Arab Emirates, and equipped with military technology made in France…A July report by the rights group said there was a constant weapons supply from the UAE, China, Russia, Turkey and Yemen into Sudan, and often into Darfur, in breach of a long-standing United Nations arms embargo on the region.
The report said Amnesty had found evidence of RSF forces using newly-manufactured UAE armored personnel carriers called Nimr Ajban, equipped with French-made Galix weapons systems, in multiple areas of Sudan, including Darfur.”—Amnesty International says weapons from U.S. allies are fueling Sudan's raging civil war, Sarah Carter, 15 Nov 2024, CBS News.
So when “dastardly” migration happens, the same foreign countries of unreasonable global economic and military power pretend (and it is an acting job of Academy Award winning proportions) that the harm they claim migration poses to them has little to nothing to do with their foreign imperialism and the colonialism and neo-colonialism they attempt to keep in place.
So what values exist within the “values-based” order?
No really, what possible cherished “democratic” values does colonialism have?
“The U.S. and Israel have reached out to officials of three East African governments to discuss using their territories as potential destinations for resettling Palestinians uprooted from the Gaza Strip under President Donald Trump's proposed post-war plan, American and Israeli officials say.
The contacts with Sudan, Somalia and the breakaway region of Somalia known as Somaliland reflect the determination by the U.S. and Israel to press ahead with a plan that has been widely condemned and raised serious legal and moral issues.”—US and Israel look to Africa for resettling Palestinians uprooted from Gaza, Josef Federman, Matthew Lee, Samy Magdy, 14 Mar 2025, ABC News.
What never occurs to foreigners to Africa is that many Africans are pro-Pan Africanism, pro-African not:
pro-West,
pro-China,
pro-Russia,
pro-India,
pro-Japan,
pro-Santa’s north pole,
pro-Mars,
pro-anyone outside African borders.
Western wars with non-African countries or regions disrespectfully places Africa’s independent minds and its working class to whom African land and seas rightfully belongs on a chessboard that Africans never elected to be on.
And that is what is unacceptable to African children.
The unreasonable entitlement of foreigners to our land, soil, minerals and choices. And the use of whatever means to interfere in Africa’s desire to be truly independent and collectively enriched, using whatever economic system we damn please.
This unreasonableness shows a wilful lack of self-awareness and respect for other people’s stuff.
That is not okay. And that goes for any non-African state trying the same game and holding the same unreasonable entitlements to someone else’s land. African land.
Africa’s working class, take back your land, seas, minerals and banking sector.
Africans should not be led anywhere.
This needs to change soon.
Foreign paths lead to blissful:
mass murder of the colonised (men, women, children and the newly born),
starvation by design and chemical warfare,
funding, training, feeding and intel-provision given to child-kidnapping terror groups like Boko Haram (and to whatever extent Al Qaeda and ISIS) or undermining of liberation movements,
years of mainstream media, think tank and blockbuster movie cover ups, and
More and more and more and more destruction.
Their foreign path leads to the continued economic enslavement of Africa and the displacement of her peoples, who will then be blamed for migrating into Europe or Britain.
Death and destruction is what Africans must move away from.
Death and destruction is at the heart of hegemonic global capitalism.
Africa must lead itself.
AFRICA IS UNDER FOREIGN ATTACK FOR DARING TO EVEN THINK, MY MOTHERLAND, MY RULES
ALLIANCE OF SAHEL STATES CONVENIENTLY KEPT OUT OF GLOBAL MAINSTREAM MEDIA UNLESS THEY CAN SMEAR THEM
It is interesting to me that global media, both Asian and Western, do not report on the leaps being made amongst the Alliance of the Sahel States: Mali, Niger and Burkino Faso.
When African countries are beleaguered and chained to the foreign correspondent desk then there are reams of reports about:
foreign monies flowing in,
the level of African government corruption that is framed as the primary source of pain, or
the poor development leading to humanitarian crises, which foreign countries have to come and rescue.
The Sahel States have led a move away from western (foreign) dependency but have been ignored as if they’re irrelevant or framed by mainstream news as solely militant gun-swingers.
The shocking journalism of the Indian First Post channel with their Palki Sharma-like spokespeople that appear to be ramping up smear reports against the Alliance of Sahel States for daring to protect their region’s independence and change their status quo of being the economic slaves of foreigners.
Burkino Faso and the like are under numerous military attacks, assassination attempts and conveniently only after they said no, to mineral comfortable, tax-avoiding, military base holding foreigners.
So how dare the India First Post team embark on these obvious attacks without elaborating on the extreme pressure this impoverished country is bearing as they break off their chains.
How dare they call their reporting “news” journalism without picking up the phone and speaking to Captain Traoré himself on what he and his alliance partners are confronting.
The billionaire-owned First Post channel spews stories about “Al-Qaeda terrorists” from Burkino Faso finding a home within Ghana, well here’s something to chew on trickle-down Jai Hind:
Which countries trained and funded and enabled Al-Qaeda? Was it Burkino Faso, Mali, Niger or Ghana?
Does your “news coverage” choices have anything to do with Burkino Faso looking to establish its own national defence industry rather than relying on you foreigners and your deep-pocketed foreign allies?
Does your now great concern for terrorism in the Sahel region have anything to do with the statement made by Togo that they too might consider economic ties with Alliance of the Sahel States? Conflict with your foreign interests and that of your pals, perhaps?
BRICS partnerships are clearly not wholly innocent or well-meaning.
Africa must be ready to battle all foreigners to our motherland.
Many Africans are proud of Mali, Niger and Burkino Faso.
The Alliance of Sahel States:
changed the terms of their mineral sales with foreign countries so that their motherland’s wealth isn’t sold for pittance and then resold by foreigners for a bomb (at their expense),
rejected IMF loans while paying off their neo-colonial debt,
sought to ensure food security for their people,
embarked on self-sufficient security plans by creating partnerships with countries they more trust and feel more comfortable with: Cuba, Russia and Venezuela,
clamped down hard on tax abuse and owed tax monies by foreign multinationals,
gave exit orders to foreign companies and organisations that do not conform with their laws,
exited regional bodies that do not recognise their desire for economic independence, and
resisted numerous assassination attempts and rebel forces (Who in NATO told Ukraine to send intel to rebels? Any guesses?) that are kept out of foreign media…conveniently.
CONGO IS A MESS OF STRONGLY SUSPECTED FOREIGN PROXY FIGHTS AND FOREIGN POSTURING
It is 2025 and we see the ordinary, working class Congolese and Sudanese remain dispensable pawns in a global (neo) colonialism project that corrupts, hardens and sucks in self-focussed African leaders in a game of control and betrayal of their motherland, iAfrika:
“Foreign aid is just the bribes that developed countries give to underdeveloped countries so they can keep exploiting and plundering them.
It is not even controversial, that’s just a fact,”@mariamtheugandan.
And if you choose not to believe Africans like Kwame Nkrumah who astutely described the colonialism makeover of the 1950s, then maybe you will believe the western journalists who saw it for themselves:
“[Foreign aid] largely goes to corporations and local elites.
The second part, is that this is not a mistake…when you start looking at the history of it, and you look at how [foreign] aid developed out of the former colonialism, you realise this has been designed from the start,” Matt Kennard, former FT journalist and author of The Racket: A Rogue Reporter vs The American Empire.
So when you see Douglas Murray, the famed Sky News expert on all things across the world, including the inner workings of the global capitalist system, says:
“The corrupt ANC in South Africa in particular loves receiving international aid money and loves squirreling it away into their own pockets…” you have to wonder why he has never mentioned any conflict-ridden monies flowing from government-linked institutions from his country, the UK, to our South African political parties as recently exposed.
He has also failed to mention how many instances and for how long so-called ‘charity’ from western colonial countries ends up in the hands of private—for profit—corporate elites (foreign and domestic) and amenable domestic political elites?
Murray says nothing for instance about former Minister Willy Bakonga’s son driving a Tesla Cybertruck on the streets of the Congo while foreign aid has streamed into the country without a single action or audit from the very colonial “charity-giving” group that forced Haiti to pay their enslavers for their freedom (right up into the 2020s):
“Today, the United States, through USAID, announced nearly $424 million in humanitarian and health assistance to address the ongoing catastrophe in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)…Today’s announcement brings the total U.S. humanitarian assistance in the DRC to more than $838 million in Fiscal Year 2024. We continue to stand by refugees and the Congolese people and we encourage other donors to join us in our critical efforts to save lives and alleviate suffering caused by this ongoing crisis.”—The United States Announces $424 Million in Additional Assistance for the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 7 Aug 2024.
“In 2024, the EU has made an initial allocation of €63.75 million in humanitarian funding to address the needs of the most vulnerable people in the DRC. Most of the EU-funded humanitarian projects are helping vulnerable people in the east of the country, where persistent conflict is ongoing.”—ECHO Factsheet - The Democratic Republic of Congo - (Last updated 13/03/2024), 15 Mar 2024.
“The European Commission has announced €60 million in new humanitarian support for the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) for 2025 in response to recent developments in the eastern region, particularly around Goma. This funding addresses the urgent needs of displaced populations affected by ongoing conflicts and epidemics.”—The EU offers €60 million in humanitarian aid to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Beata Sur, 28 Jan 2025, European Interest
The same crowd that did not believe it necessary to give Africa reparations during the so-called post-colonialism era are somehow keen to blindly give foreign aid to Africa?
Does that seem in line with their values? Does that seem like bad accounting…or is it really?
Murray certainly does not question why it is not the “charity-giving” foreign governments themselves, but rather advocacy groups, that have taken up the task of suing corporations that benefit from child-labour mine operations in the Congo?
“An international advocacy group has accused Apple, Google, Microsoft, Dell and Tesla of ‘knowingly benefiting from’ the use of young children to mine cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
International Rights Advocates filed a federal class action against the five companies in Washington, D.C. on Sunday, where the group is based. The complaint claims that the firms ‘are knowingly benefiting from and aiding and abetting the cruel and brutal use of young children’ to mine cobalt in extremely dangerous conditions.
The defendants have known for a ‘significant period of time’ that Congo’s mining sector ‘is dependent upon children,’ the complaint said, adding that cobalt mined in the region is listed as a good produced by child labor or forced labor by the US Department of Labor.”—Apple, Google, Microsoft, Dell and Tesla are sued over alleged child labor in Congo, Michelle Toh, 18 Dec 2019, CNN
Curious to know what ever happened to this case or was it like the Anglo-American case in the UK and Barrick Gold case in Canada, brushed aside under a “values-based” justice system?
THE FOREIGN NARRATIVE ATTACKS ARE MERELY GLOBAL—COLONIALISM—CAPITALISM UNMASKED
African elites (both corporate and political), long ago lost in wealth accumulation and their globally designated role of “controlling the blacks” or the working class of Africa accept all kinds of foreign aid and opportunities as motivation to open up the legs of their mother to foreign, condomless extractivists.
In the words of AfriCom’s Senate Committee Hearing: “AFRICOM's campaign revolves around central themes of ensuring strategic access, countering threats to the homeland and U.S. interests, preparing for and responding to crisis, and lastly, bolstering our allies and partners.”
This has been the western-dominated, global capitalist system that foreigners to Africa are taught is moral, ethical and unintentionally harm.
In reality, global capitalism is just colonialism.
And any changes to the capitalist system is merely a reconfiguring of the colonialism without the jazz hands of large amounts of foreign aid.
Because as we know, US foreign aid was paused but not foreign military spending, including that which relates to Africa.
And Africans do not want foreign militaries in Africa. Bases, encampments, paid-for and covertly trained terrorist and rebel groups, all of these are foreign to Africa and its vision.
Whether it is from Asia, Arab states or the always-involved (le sigh) western “free world”, none of this fiasco should be happening on African soil.
Our motherland, our rules.
Our motherland, not yours.
WEAK AFRICAN LEADERS ARE LEADERS TIED TO THE FOREIGN DRIP
But while the pause on US foreign aid (but not foreign military spending) stopped the feeding scheme that African elites (both corporate and political) are allegedly used to in their predominantly neoliberal capitalist countries, the reality for African countries like the Congo is that when the foreign greasing tap is turned off (even temporarily), elites scramble to switch it back on.
The result is a coordinated political (and perhaps corporate) scramble to get back on the pipe, at whatever cost to the wishes, needs, ambitions, desires and liberation of the people of Congo:
“In his first interview since the launch of the 2025 M23 offensive, Tshisekedi [President of Congo] ‘offered the United States and Europe a stake in his country’s vast mineral wealth, a sector currently dominated by China’, the US daily reported.
The Congolese president had ‘pinned his hopes on Western pressure against Rwanda’, calculating that a deal could bring his country security and stability, said the report…
The interview was published a day after a US consultancy, commissioned by Congolese senator and Tshisekedi supporter Pierre Kanda Kalambayi, sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, offering a ‘strategic partnership’ between the two countries. The letter proposed access to Congolese minerals, operational control of a deep-water port to serve as an export hub, and the establishment of a joint strategic mineral stockpile.”—Trump to DR Congo’s rescue? What we know about a proposed US-Congolese mining deal, David Rich, 13 Mar 2025, france24.com.
And this is despite the ground swell of belief amongst ordinary Africans that foreign countries are the puppeteers behind all of their pain:
“Angry protesters burnt the flags of the US and Belgium, DR Congo's former colonial power, on Monday. Demonstrations have taken place outside several Western embassies in recent days. In the latest protests, anti-riot police pushed back demonstrators as they tried to advance towards embassies.
‘The Westerners are behind the looting of our country. Rwanda doesn't work alone, so they must leave our country,’ Pepin Mbindu, who joined the protest, was quoted by Reuters news agency as saying.”—DR Congo protests: Police fire tear gas to disperse anti-Western demonstrations in Kinshasa, Emery Makumeno & Wedaeli Chibelushi, 12 Feb 2024, BBC
So when the Center for Global Development writes:
“…the evidence backs you up: PEPFAR support is associated with improved recipient attitudes towards the United States.
US assistance in general is associated with countries subsequently voting with the US in UN Security Council votes.
US aid is also linked to increased support for the United States and to a stronger commitment to liberal democratic values in the countries that receive it.”
Trust and believe, this actually means: This is how we control Africans.
We control their land and policy choices through this system of aid.
What Africans increasingly want is for African control, African choice, African-controlled and steered defence, African unity, African economies and competitive industries.
No one should come before our own.
No one.
That is fair. That is just.
WEAK AFRICAN LEADERS ARE ALSO THOSE THAT PLAY STRONG BUT ARE IN A LOOK-OUT-FOR-MYSELF-AND-MINE GAME
In late 2024, Rwanda announced its five-year strategy to become an fintech hub in Africa:
“Rwanda launched a five-year fintech strategy on Thursday, with the goal of developing a fintech ecosystem to position the country as a regional financial centre.
According to the Ministry of Information Communication Technology (ICT) and Innovation, the plan aims to establish Rwanda as the preferred location for African fintech companies and investments, as well as to strengthen its status as the continent's top financial hub.
It is consistent with national goals to increase ICT penetration and encourage the use of digital payment systems, according to the government.
The ambitious scheme, covering 2024-2029, aims to attract US$200 million worth of investments for local fintech firms.”
Interestingly, Rwanda, despite denials, is well-suspected of being behind the M23 Rebels that invaded the Congo and wreaked havoc, disturbing the neo-colonialism that was already neatly in place.
While the excuse was that Rwanda was defending and squashing the unfair discrimination and abuse of Tutsis living in the Congo (not sure how a foreign military invasion helps things), the comfortable invasion of M23 rebels comes neatly as Rwanda strategises over its future tech success.
And what do we know all technology needs?
Yes, you guessed it. Child-mined cobalt.
If there is any connection between Rwanda and the rebels and that connection is related to its ambitious tech strategic plans, Rwanda may well be a sub-imperialist in Africa.
A sub-imperialist would be a country that is guilty of imperialism toward smaller countries (often in their region) but suffer under global imperialism coming from larger economic global powers.
And the reason why this needs to be explored is because Congo’s people are not wrong to suspect foreign non-African countries involvement.
“Among those partners are the United States, who contribute the biggest sum to Rwanda's health sector. Annual investments of about $116 million in the last three years have benefitted an estimated 13 million Rwandans. In 2021, the United States provided $147 million in foreign assistance, making it Rwanda's largest bilateral donor.”—Explaining the West's love affair with Rwanda, Cai Nebe, 15 Mar 2023.
Whether run by open democracies or more authoritarian regimes such as that which exists in Zimbabwe or Eswatini, African countries have lived under foreign control, predominantly western colonial control, for hundreds of years, continuing to take instruction from foreigners on matters that they should make themselves on their land.
Rwanda’s involvement in the mess of Congo cannot be seen in exclusion of non-African countries.
The recent ceasefire of hostilities for instance comes after talks that were held in Qatar.
Why are talks about African peace being held in a foreign non-African country? Why?
And while foreign countries are knee-deep in a region that isn’t their land and not their people, we are expected to believe that foreigners have no part to play in the more than 7000 ordinary people that have been murdered in this invasion.
In the meantime, Rwanda in its self-absorption and trippy and selective use of African history hits back at countries like Belgium that have allegedly argued for sanctions against Rwanda for, what I suspect, is the breaking of Europe’s more comfortable access to Congolese minerals.
Personally, Rwanda cannot be allowed to use the history of African suffering while in anyway causing more African suffering. To do so would be to pull out a page from the imperialist handbook on how to deflect, ignore or whitewash your complicity.
Yet again, that’s not okay.
The unreasonable entitlement to other people’s land extends to all leaders in Africa who presume it proper to take from the working class majority in every African country and across countries that which rightfully belongs to the people, not your private or singular country ambitions.
The Congo’s cobalt belongs to Congo’s working class.
No one else.
Not the sons of ministers.
Not the country’s president or his wife.
Not the president or people of other African or foreign countries.
So, as we swallow our shame of African duplicity and arrogance, African self-absorption and betrayal and the never-ending claws of foreign countries to smear, control, aid, control, smear, control, grab, kill, burn and cleanse lands that are not theirs, let us forget the:
inconsequential words of condemnation (from the colonised), or
open or silent collusive support (from the colonisers),
we are all going to burn in hell for allowing, steering, enabling or justifying human suffering to continue.
The only difference is, some of us are going to wake up in hell, look around and call it "the good ol' days".
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.