Total Asian genocide impossible? Aryans doomed from the start?

The idea of total Asian death has sat with me for years - exemplified by my beloved Chechar who propagates such violent fantasies unironically. Indeed, it has been my perennial charge against the Europeans, who, upon acquiring the Promethean fire of technology, used it to civilise and strengthen their Asian race enemies (see William S. Clarke who helped the Japanese to colonise Hokkaido as opposed to settling it with Aryan Norics).

But was it ever feasible? Over the years I never questioned the logistical nature of the hypothetical opposite of the kindest empire the history had ever seen - an Aryan empire, using its ephemeral technological edge, hell-bent on exterminating the Hindus and the Mongoloids, thus preventing the rise of India and China in the future to contest the fair race’s world supremacy. This time, I have modelled a few scenarios, aided by Gemini 3 Pro AI.

Three scenarios - 1) pre-1914 European sister empires; 2) triumphant Hitlerian Germany; 3) fantasical genocidal America.

1. The issue with the exterminationist project of 1900 apparently comes from the frail nature of European colonialism - an economic extraction project that was contingent on the good will of the allegedly conquered peoples. The argument goes that if the Europeans had enacted a policy of depopulation across British India, Dutch East Indies and French Indochina, their flimsy garrisons would have swept away, as their domination was in essence a social contract - an unequal treaty, yet a treaty nonetheless. Let alone it would have gone against the Mammon worship of capitalism, destroying their splendid economies out of a lofty religious goal to prevent the suffering of the future European generations at the hands of Asian savages.

3. Conversely, the problem with Hitler als Führer Amerikas, an anti-Christian Anglo empire enacting Generalplan Süd and Generalplan West (total genocide of Latin Americans and Asians), is the following:

1) yes, America could have enacted a total maritime blockade on the shores of Asia, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Okhotsk - no other nation possessed a navy after the downfall of Japan;

2) the trouble comes during the actual impetus to exterminate every last subsistence farmer across these unimaginably vast lands - they simply won’t die, so the Aryans would have to put boots on the ground, killing them manually in cold blood, thus inviting annoying insurgencies, with zero cooperation from the locals;

3) the other part of the plan - bombardment, eventually nuclear bombardment of the urban centres - was definitely possible, but again, the main population lived in the countryside (unlike nowadays), and the main trouble with this is that…

4) the main, overarching counter-point comes from the geopolital angle - the Asian populations, faced not with the vomit-inducing, heart-melting Christian kindness, but with the infinitely ruthless, starry-eyed, Himmlerian Dirlewanger from Eldamar, would have had no choice but to open their borders wide open to the Soviet military, industrial and scientific help. If in our timeline, China split from Russia immediately upon Stalin’s death, and India was permanently neutral and relaxed, in this scenario, the USSR would have expanded its borders to the Indo-Pacific, thus providing those non-White demons with the arsenal from the heart of the Slavlands.

2. Now, what about by far the most vrilliant outcome? The vaunted triumph of National Socialist Germany and Europe in Russia in 1941-43? The benefits to the survival of the Aryans are enormous - the NSDAP and SS lording over a fortress carved into the vast continent from the Pyrenees to the Urals, all the resources at hand, self-image assured, culture war won and continously expanded upon in the new, more peaceful counter-terrorist victories in the pacifying Russia.

Yet the question I posited remains - would a victorious Aryandom have been capable of exterminating the Hindus and Mongoloids, even under such favourable conditions? The answer comes from the geopolitics. If we assume the Anglo-American world to remain lost to the maddening effects of Christian pity & piety, upon the downfall of Japan, they would have poured their heart and soul into strengthening India and China as a counter-weight to illustrious Europe. This would have led to those wild lands industrialising even faster than in our debauched timeline!

Granted, the survival of the Aryan race would have obviously been assured. But the conclusion I’m drawing here is that the technological edge enjoyed by the fair race thanks to the genius of industry and technology was insufficient for truthful world conquest. Even such a benign scenario as total Russo-Ukrainian genocide and return of the Nordic race to the Eurasian steppe would have ended in an enforced interracial friendship.

Granted, nuclear & biological weapons of mass destruction might have been used to some effect - but if it’s a mutually disastrous one, it’s but an attempt to destroy the technological civilisation at large, which is not helpful to a targeted genocide of one race and survival of another one either.

P.S. In essence, the main counter-point to my whole model is that the West’s technological supremacy was insufficient to prevent the rise of India/China. Effectively a checkmate. The only reality where it’s possible is the fanciful world of the West holding hands together in a Marxist-esque “racial consciousness” - but that’s actually unrealistic. America would always try to spite Nazi Germany, and Soviet Russia would always spite America.

America being Christian made Russia self-destruct out of kindness, so that was a plus. But the rise of China was unavoidable one way or another? Maybe our timeline’s Bush Sr., the CIA mastermind behind the implosion of Russia, should have resumed the siege of China immediately in 1991, thus making it the best scenario for the West? But it might have pushed China to develop its nuclear arsenal - unlike in our timeline, where they stalled. Then America would have needed to nuke China and India, but... they’re protected by the surviving Russian nuclear umbrella! Still a checkmate.

The only way forward currently is if the conspiracy-minded folks’ fears materialise in a nuclear Barbarossa from NATO to conquer Russia and destroy its nuclear arsenal safely - but that is contingent on the Kremlin’s treason and self-destruction. And even that must be done before China’s nuclear arsenal expansion making a war with China unfeasible.

Again, while I have lost the inspiration to write insightful articles such as this, this particular one has only been possible thanks to my use of Gemini AI - as I do not have friends to discuss such scenarios with, and one needs the opposite to bounce ideas off of.