You Can’t Think Your Way Into Writing

“I write entirely to find out what I'm thinking, what I'm looking at, what I see and what it means. What I want and what I fear.” Joan Didion

We write to find meaning, and yet we often decide what we think that meaning should be before we put words on the page.

A father is cruel. A place is lonely. A moment is significant.

And then we go looking for details to prove it. But you can’t think your way into writing. Not really.

Because when you start from judgment, you are limited to what you already know. You don’t discover anything.

The process of writing depends on discovery, on paying attention.

In my writing workshops, I often borrow from yoga and mindfulness practices to help clear out mind clutter, consider new angles, and allow space for us to let our creativity wander. One practice I use a lot is visualization, which can be a really powerful tool. Visualization is basically imagining something or trying to see something in your mind’s eye.

Recently, at a conference where I was speaking about writing and place, I asked the room to try something simple. I asked them to close their eyes and then I guided them to visualize the place they were writing about—not to analyze or interpret, but simply to see it.

This is a powerful tool that I use in my own practice. I’m often surprised at what I notice when I visualize, or how I become aware of something important that was never on my radar.

When I try to think my way into writing, that is, to decide what something will be and then make it be just that, my writing feels flat.

For example, if I’m writing about a character’s father, I might decide the father is a no-good rotten SOB, and then try to make the details fit that judgment. Because I already know the main character struggles with their father, and so everything I write is bent on justifying that emotional conclusion.

But instead, if I first imagine what the father looks like, what words he uses, how he dresses, what he chooses not to say, I’m broadening my perspective on him. And if I zoom in on the concrete details, that can be enough to allow the reader to interpret. Occasionally, we do have to interpret for the reader (remind me to write about my feelings on show vs. tell), but more often intentionally choosing concrete details is enough.

When we start from judgment, we don’t discover anything—we just confirm what we already believe. What gets lost in that process is the thing writing actually depends on: attention. We need to pay attention before we try to interpret.

This is where visualization becomes useful. Visualization interrupts that interpretation. When you close your eyes and actually try to see something—the father, the room, the place, the moment—you are forced out of judgment for a moment.

You’re not asking what it means yet, you’re asking what is here.

And that shift matters because before interpretation, there is almost always something simpler: a sensory presence. A texture. A sensation in the body. A detail that hasn’t yet been turned into meaning.

What I’ve found is that when writers start from this place—even briefly—the writing changes. There is less strain to figure things out in advance. Less pressure to arrive already knowing what something is supposed to mean. There is less need to explain. More presence.

It doesn’t necessarily make writing easier, but it can make things clearer.

Afterwards, at this conference, someone asked me a question:

What if we have trouble seeing a place?

Not everyone can close their eyes and immediately picture something vivid and complete. That is not how it is for me.

Usually, visualizing begins with a sound, the way the father character whistles while he cooks dinner, or a texture, the feeling of his wool jacket that he picked up from a thrift store, or a smell, the smell of the meal he cooks on Sundays.

Sometimes visualization can begin with something more indirect—an object, a fragment, a single detail that you can hold onto long enough for the rest to gather around it. So sometimes if you stay there and ask yourself questions, you can add to what you see. What is in the pan he is stirring? How does he hold the spatula? What color is the wool jacket? What kind of shoes is he wearing?

And sometimes the “image” isn’t visual at first. It’s a sense of orientation. A feeling of where things are in relation to each other. Or a kind of emotional temperature.

The goal isn’t necessarily to produce a clear mental picture.

It’s to stay with whatever form of attention is available, to sit with it for a while, without rushing to interpret and turn it into language. Because once you do that—once you give yourself something to stay with, even if it’s partial—the rest tends to follow more easily.

If you want to try visualization in a more structured way, I’ve included a short, five-minute guided visualization below. It’s a simple way to practice staying with attention before beginning a writing session.

Visualization practices like this can help clear some of the mental clutter and create a little more space to begin.

I hope it’s useful to you.

Leave a comment